Errors, phantom author, retraction? It’s enough to set your teeth on edge
Authorship issues, sloppy science, deception — more often than not, at least one of these is at the heart of a retracted paper. But it’s rare when all three are involved. Which, of course, means that such a case is precisely what we’re about to deliver. The Journal of Medical Case Reports, a … Continue reading Errors, phantom author, retraction? It’s enough to set your teeth on edge