Papers that cite Retraction Watch

Over the years, many papers have cited the work of Retraction Watch, whether a blog post, an article we’ve written for another outlet, or our database. Here’s a selection. Know of one we’ve missed? Let us know at team@retractionwatch.com.

  1. aan de Brugh M. 2020. Magentische stenen en ander coronawangedrag. NRC. 31 December. (News Article)
  2. Abalkina A. 2021. Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive. Scientometrics. 126, 7123–7148. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0 (Journal Article – Research)
  3. Abalkina A. 2021. Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from Russia. (Preprint) arXiv. 2112.13322.
  4. Abbas M, Pires D, Peters A, Morel CM, Hurst S, et al. Conflicts of interest in infection prevention and control research: no smoke without fire. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(10):1679-1690. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5361-z (Journal Article – Research)
  5. Abbasi K. 2022. Russia’s war: Why the BMJ opposes an academic boycott. BMJ. 376.
  6. Academia Magazine (n.d.). International bodies find KFUEIT VC guilty of plagiarism. Academia. (News Article)
  7. Aguado-López E, Becerril-García A. 2021. The duration of peer review: An obstacle to scientific communication? Interciencia. 46(2), 56-64. (Journal Article – Research)
  8. Akst J. 2022. PLOS One pulls five papers tied to Alzheimer’s drug controversy. The Scientist. 31 March. (News Article)
  9. Alfirevic Z. Retracted papers are only the tip of the iceberg of untrustworthy evidence. AJOG MFM. 2020;2(4):100223. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100223
  10. Almroth BC, Jutflet F, Bour A. 2020. Accurate science requires that we base our work on accurate publications. Environmental Pollution. 261. (Journal Article – Letter to the Editor)
  11. Anderson C, Nugent K, Peterson C. 2021. Academic journal retractions and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 12. (Journal Article – Research)
  12. Ansede M. 2024. El aspirante a rector que escribió cuatro párrafos y se citó a sí mismo 100 veces. El Pais. Published March 15, 2024. (News Article)
  13. Ansede M. 2024. El odontólogo José Luis Calvo Guirado entra en el top 20 mundial de científicos con más estudios retirados. El Pais. Published March 6, 2024. (News Article)
  14. Ansede M. 2024. El aspirante a rector que escribió cuatro párrafos y se citó a sí mismo 100 veces. El Pais. Published March 15, 2024. (News Article)
  15. Armond ACV, Gordign B, Lewis J, Hosseini M, Bodnár JK, et al. 2021. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Medical Ethics. 22. (Journal Article – Review)
  16. Arthur PL, Hearn L. 2021. Toward open research: A narrative review of the challenges and opportunities for open humanities. Journal of Communication. 71(5), 827-853. (Journal Article – Review/Editorial)
  17. Audisio K, Robinson NB, Soletti GJ, Cancelli G, Dimagli A,…Gaudino M. 2021. A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature. International Journal of Cardiology. 349, 109-114. (Journal Article)
  18. Avissar-Whitting M, Bakker C, Heckner H, Massip S, Schneider J,…Woods N. 2021. Addressing disorder in scholarly communication: Strategies from NISO Plus 2021. Information Services & Use. 41(1-2), 107-121. (Journal Article)
  19. Banerjee A. Jargon and metrics for evaluation: Are they valid or instead promote questionable practices? Medical Journal of Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2020;13(4):295. doi:10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_33_20
  20. Bar AC. Medical reversals and retractions in clinical evaluations. Journal of Medical Device Regulation. 2020;17(2). Accessed September 23, 2020. https://globalregulatorypress.com/product/medical-reversals-and-retractions-in-clinical-evaluations-may-2020/
  21. Barnett A. 2024. Checking BibTeX files against the Retraction Watch database. Median Watch (blog). posted 3/12/2024. Retrieved from https://medianwatch.netlify.app/post/retraction_watch/
  22. Bendiscioli S, Garfinkel MS. Governance of Research Integrity: Options for a Coordinated Approach in Europe. EMBO; 2020. https://www.embo.org/documents/science_policy/governance_of_ri.pdf
  23. Bennett C, Chambers LM, Al-Hafez L, et al. Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. Published online August 19, 2020:100201. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201
  24. Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Grey A. 2024. Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Published online March 13, 2024. doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004 (Journal Article – Review)
  25. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. 2021. Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Accountability in Research. Online First. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933
  26. Bouter L. 2024. Fake academic papers are on the rise: why they’re a danger and how to stop them. The Conversation. Published March 6, 2024.
  27. Candal-Pedreira C, Ruana-Ravina A, Pérez-Río M. 2021. Should the European Union have an office of research integrity? European Journal of Internal Medicine. 94:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2021.07.009
  28. Carlisle JB. False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(4):472-479. doi:10.1111/anae.15263
  29. Carney Almroth B, Jutfelt F, Bour A. Accurate science requires that we base our work on accurate publications. Environmental Pollution. 2020;261:114238. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114238
  30. Chakraborty J, Pradhan DK, Nandi S. On the identification and analysis of citation pattern irregularities among journals. Expert Systems. n/a(n/a):e12561. doi:10.1111/exsy.12561
  31. Chambers LM, Michener CM, Falcone T. Authors’ reply re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2019;126(10):1289-1290. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15828
  32. Chan MS, Jones C, Albarracín D. 2017. Countering False Beliefs: An Analysis of the Evidence and Recommendations of Best Practices for the Retraction and Correction of Scientific Misinformation. In Jamieson KH, Kahan DM, Scheufele DA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication. Oxford Publishing. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37
  33. Coates H, Goben A, Briney K. 2023. What if It Didn’t Happen: Data Management and Avoiding Research Misconduct. Journal of eScience Librarianship. 12(3):e746. doi:10.7191/jeslib.746
  34. Cortegiani A, Catalisano G, Ippolito M, Giarratano A, Absalom AR, Einav S. 2021. Retracted papers on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 126(4):e155-e156. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.008
  35. Coudert F-X. Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science. Chem Mater. 2019;31(10):3593-3598. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00897
  36. Cox A, Craig R, Tourish D. Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics. Research Policy. 2018;47(5):924-35. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016
  37. Crotty D. 2024. The Latest “Crisis” — Is the Research Literature Overrun with ChatGPT- and LLM-generated Articles? The Scholarly Kitchen. Published on March 20, 2024. (Blog Article)
  38. D’Souza DM, Sade RM, Moffatt-Bruce SD. The many facets of research integrity: What can we do to ensure it? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;160(3):730-733. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.127
  39. Dal-Ré R. Analysis of biomedical Spanish articles retracted between 1970 and 2018. Med Clin (Barc). 2020;154(4):125-130. doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2019.04.033
  40. Dal-Ré R, Bouter LM, Moher D, Marušić A. Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors. BMJ. 2020;370. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2872
  41. Dal‐Ré R. Analysis of retracted articles on medicines administered to humans. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;85(9):2179-2181. doi:10.1111/bcp.14021
  42. De Almeida RMV. 2022. How did the scientific publication system respond to the Covid-19 pandemic?. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 2(3). doi:10.47909/ijsmc.160 (Journal Article: Commentary)
  43. De Cassai A, Volpe F, Geraldini F, Dost B, Boscolo A, Navalesi P. 2023. Citing retracted literature: a word of caution. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 17 January 2023. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104177 (Journal Article – Research)
  44. Decullier E, Maisonneuve H. Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices. BMC Research Notes. 2018;11(1):490. doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3576-2
  45. Dehdarirad T, Schirone M. 2023. Use of positive terms and certainty language in retracted and non-retracted articles: The case of biochemistry. Journal of Information Science. doi:10.1177/01655515231176650
  46. Díaz GM. El fraude en las publicaciones científicas: más allá de fabricar, falsificar y plagiar. TecnoLógicas. 2061;19(36). Accessed September 23, 2020. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-77992016000100001
  47. Dinis-Oliveira RJ. COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science.” Accessed September 23, 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754
  48. Djekidel MN, Rosikiewicz W, Peng JC, Kanneganti TD, Hui Y, Jin H, Hedges D, Schreiner P, Fan Y, Wu G, Xu B. CovidExpress: an interactive portal for intuitive investigation on SARS-CoV-2 related transcriptomes. (Preprint) bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.14.444026
  49. Dougherty MV. Translation Plagiarism. In: Dougherty MV, ed. Disguised Academic Plagiarism: A Typology and Case Studies for Researchers and Editors. Research Ethics Forum. Springer International Publishing; 2020:13-36. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46711-1_2
  50. Dougherty MV. The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics. 2021. doi:10.1177/17470161211018257
  51. Eaton S E. 2024. Supporting Graduate Students to Avoid Predatory Publishing and Questionable Conferences. In P Habibie & I Fazel (Eds.), Predatory Practices in Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Sharing (pp. 183-197). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003170723 (Book Chapter)
  52. Elango B. 2021. Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics 126, 3965–3981. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03895-1
  53. Endres J, Graber MA, Dachs R. 2015. If It Seems Too Good To Be True. American Family Physician. May 15, 2015.
  54. Fanelli D, Wong J, Moher D. 2021. What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses. Accountability in Research. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1947810
  55. Feng L, Yuan J, Yang L. An observation framework for retracted publications in multiple dimensions. Scientometrics, 2020;125(2):1445-1457. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03702-3
  56. Fiore M, Alfieri A, Pace MC, Simeon V, Chiodini P, Leone S, Wirz S, Cuomo A, Stoia V, Cascella M. A scoping review of retracted publications in anesthesiology. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2021;15:179-88
  57. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. 2023. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 329(8):637–639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344 (Journal Article – Research)
  58. Fong EA, Wilhite AW, Hickman C, Lee Y. The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2020;48(2):331-339. doi:10.1177/1073110520935347
  59. Frampton G, Woods L, Scott DA. 2021. Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice. PLoS ONE. 16(10): e0258935 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258935 (Journal Article-Research)
  60. Freilich J, Soomi K. 2023. Is the Patent System Sensitive to Incorrect Information? The Review of Economics and Statistics. July 24 2023. pp. 1-38. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01353 (Journal Article-Research)
  61. Gaston TE, Ounsworth F, Senders T, Ritchie S, Jones E. Factors affecting journal submission numbers: Impact factor and peer review reputation. Learned Publishing. 2020;33(2):154-162. doi:10.1002/leap.1285
  62. Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Audisio K, Rahouma M, Benedetto U, Kurlansky P, Fremes SE. 2021. Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2021;181(8):1118–1121. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1807
  63. Ghorbi A, Fazeli-Varzaneh M, Ghaderi-Azad E, Ausloos M, Kozak M. 2021. Retracted papers by Iranian authors: causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations. Scientometrics. 126:7351–7371. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04104-9
  64. Grey, A., Portch, R., Gaby, A., Grey, H. and Bolland, M., 2020. Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrity. Accountability in Research. 2020;28(3):149-161. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1813580
  65. Grey A, Avenell A, Bolland M. 2021. Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group. Accountability in Research. Online First. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1920409
  66. Guerra L. 2024. Citation Metrics and Strategic Mutations of Scientific Research: Narratives and Evidence. JLIS.It. 15(1):144-58. doi:10.36253/jlis.it-538.
  67. Hami A, Jahani Y, Mousavi AS. 2024. Analysis of the Researchers’ Citation of Retracted Articles in the Field of Orthopedics. Iranian Journal of Southern Medicine. 26(4):260-272.
  68. Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics 126, 5181–5199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03962-7
  69. Hawkes N. Inquiry into eminent psychologist failed to list many unsafe papers, biographer claims. BMJ. 2019;367. doi:10.1136/bmj.l6329
  70. Heibi I, Peroni S. 2021. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: the Wakefield 1998 et al.’s case. Scientometrics. 126:8433–8470. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04097-5
  71. Hesselmann F, Graf V, Schmidt M, Reinhart M. The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current sociology, 2017;65(6):814-845. doi:10.1177/0011392116663807
  72. Hesselmann F, Reinhart M. Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct. Social Studies of Science. 2021;51(3):414-438. doi: 10.1177/0306312720975201
  73. Hodgkinson M. 2023. Reporting Research Misconduct: When, How and To Whom. UK Research Integrity Office. Version 10. doi:10.37672/UKRIO.2023.03.reportingresearchmisconduct (Organization Report – Guideline)
  74. Horbach SPJM, Halffman W. Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? Minerva. 2019;58:139-161. doi:10.1007/s11024-019-09388-z
  75. Horton J, Krishna Kumar D, Wood A. Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: The case of Professor James Hunton. Research Policy. 2020;49(8):104084. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104084
  76. Hyatt M, Thiruvathukal GK, Moreira D. 2024. Robust Source Attribution of Synthetically Generated Western Blot Images. figshare. Journal Contribution posted on 61/6/2024. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24954600 (Technical Report-Preprint – Research)
  77. Ibrahim S, Saw A. The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2020;14(2):1-6. doi:10.5704/MOJ.2007.003
  78. Ing EB. A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2021;12:1021-103. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S328648
  79. Jamieson KH. 2021. How conspiracists exploited COVID-19 science. Nature Human Behaviour. 5:1464-1465. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01217-2.
  80. Kadykalo AN, Haddaway NR, Rytwinski T, Cooke SJ. 2021. Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID-19 environmental science and a fit-for-purpose evidence base. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 2:e12041. doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12041
  81. Kharasch ED. 2021. Scientific Integrity and Misconduct—Yet Again. Anesthesiology. 135:377-379. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003916
  82. Khatter A, Naughton M, Dambha-Miller H, Redmond P. 2021, Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1403
  83. Kim SY, Yi HJ, Cho H-M, Huh S. How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification. Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):122-127. doi:10.6087/kcse.172
  84. Kinney N, Wubah A, Roig M, Garner HR. 2021. Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 6:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00106-y
  85. Kramer K. 2021. Publishers grapple with an invisible foe as huge organised fraud hits scientific journals. Chemistry World. May 25, 2021.
  86. Kumar A, Siwach AK. 2024. Analysis of Indian Retracted Publications: A Study Based on Scopus Data. The Serials Librarian. Published online May 19, 2024 ahead of print. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2024.2306396
  87. Lawrence B. 2024. Frontiers’ journals saw large scale retractions—where does that leave the publisher’s reputation with researchers? BMJ. 384:q659. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q659
  88. Lefkowitz J. 2023. Values and Ethics of Industrial-organizational Psychology. Taylor & Francis. ISBN:9781000839630,100083963X (Book)
  89. Lesk M, Mattern JB, Sandy HM. Are Papers with Open Data More Credible? An Analysis of Open Data Availability in Retracted PLoS Articles In: International Conference on Information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer; 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_14
  90. Li W, Mol BW. Re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2019;126(10):1289-1289. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15829
  91. Li-Wan-Po A, Peterson GM. 2020. Drug compliance and the Morisky Adherence Scale: An expression of concern and a warning. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 46:1-3. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13325.
  92. Loadsman JA. Why does retraction take so much longer than publication? Anaesthesia. 2019;74(1):3-5. doi:10.1111/anae.14484
  93. Lowe D. April 17, 2024. There Are Mistakes, And There Are Mistakes. Science. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/there-are-mistakes-and-there-are-mistakes (Journal Blog: Commentary)
  94. Lupia A, Allison DB, Jamieson KH, Heimberg J, Skipper M, Wolf SM. 2024. Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(11):p.e2319488121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2319488121
  95. Malkov D, Yaqub O, Siepel J. 2023. The spread of retracted research into policy literature. Quantitative Science Studies. 4 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00243
  96. Mani G, Hope T. Viral Science: Masks, Speed Bumps, and Guard Rails. Patterns. 2020;1(6). doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100101
  97. Mansourzadeh MJ, Ghazimirsaeid J, Motamedi N, Najafi A, Abubakar AA, Dehdarirad H. A Survey of Iranian Retracted Publications Indexed in PubMed. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(1):188-194.
  98. Margry PJ. On Scholarly Misconduct and Fraud, and What We Can Learn from It. Ethnologia Europaea. 14:30;49(2). doi:10.16995/ee.1646
  99. Mavrogenis AF, Scarlat MM. 2023. Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 47, 605–609. doi:10.1007/s00264-023-05715-y
  100. McFall-Johnsen M. 2024. An AI-generated rat with a giant penis highlights a growing crisis of fake science that’s plaguing the publishing business. Business Insider. Published March 18, 2024. (News Article)
  101. Mistry V, Grey A, Bolland MJ. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications. Accountability in Research. 2019;26(5):277-287. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1612244
  102. Moritz CP. 40 years Western blotting: A scientific birthday toast. Journal of Proteomics. 2020;212:103575. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103575
  103. Mott A, Fairhurst C, Torgerson D. Assessing the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trial reports: an interrupted time-series analysis. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2019;24(1):44-51. doi:10.1177/1355819618797965
  104. Mousavi AS, Global Y, Hami A. 2023. Analysis of researchers’ reference status to discredited articles in the field of orthopedics.{Translated Title} Iranian Journal of Southern Medicine. 26(4): 260-272.
  105. Moussa S. 2023. Journal hijacking: Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing as a victim and the impacts. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing. 29(1):1-5. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1817 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  106. Nagella AB, Madhugiri VS. 2020. Journal Retraction Rates and Citation Metrics: An Ouroboric Association? Cureus. 12(11):e11542. doi:10.7759/cureus.11542
  107. Nair LB, Ascani A. 2022. Addressing low-profile misconduct in management academia through theoretical triangulation and transformative ethics education. The International Journal of Management Education. 20(3):100728. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100728
  108. Nato CG, Tabacco L, Bilotta F. Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2021. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107252
  109. Nogueira TE, Gonçalves AS, Leles CR, Batista AC, Costa LR. A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. BMC Research Notes. 2017;10(253):1-8.
  110. Nosek BA, Hardwicke TE, Moshontz H, Allard A, Corker KS, Dreber A, Fidler F, Hilgard J, Struhl MK, Nuijten MB, Rohrer JM, Romero F, Scheel AM, Schere LD, Schonbrodt FD, Vazire S. 2022. Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science. Annual Review of Psychology. 73:719-748. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
  111. Oranksy I, Fremes SE, Kurlansky P, Gaudino M. 2021. Retractions in medicine: the tip of the iceberg. European Heart Journal. 42:4205-4206. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab398
  112. Otake T. April 9, 2024. Little change in Japan’s research sector 10 years after stem cell fraud. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/04/09/japan/science-health/10-years-since-stap/ (Newspaper Article)
  113. Ozair A, Bhat V. Omama M. Retractions and Withdrawals in Neurology Literature: A 2020 Analysis of the Retraction Watch Database. Neurology. 2021;96(15 Supplement):2668.
  114. Palla IA, Singson M, Thiyagarajan S. A comparative analysis of retracted papers in Health Sciences from China and India. Accountability in Research. 2020;27(7):401-416. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1754804
  115. Pantziarka P, Meheus L. Journal retractions in oncology: a bibliometric study. Future Oncology. 2019;15(31):3597-3608. doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0233
  116. Park J, Lee JY, Kwon O-J. How the retracted publications are managed and used? A South Korean case. 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 2018:7.
  117. Paruzel-Czachura M, Baran L, Spendel Z. 2021. Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research. Research Ethics. 17(3):375-397. doi:10.1177/1747016120980562
  118. Phelps RP. 2024. Worse than Plagiarism: False Firstness Claims and Dismissive Literature Reviews. Minding the Campus (webpage). Posted 2/9/2024. https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2024/02/09/worse-than-plagiarism-false-firstness-claims-and-dismissive-literature-reviews/
  119. Picazo D, Pérez-Piñón MT, Contreras CP, Sagarnaga-Chávez D. La estafa académica: fraude en las publicaciones científicas. TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua. 2019;13(3):135-139.
  120. Piccoli GB. Ethics of publication, between forgery, retraction and protecting freedom: an ENJOY score for authors and editors. J Nephrol. 2019;32(6):847-850. doi:10.1007/s40620-019-00645-8
  121. Rahman MT. 2024. Should we penalise scientific misconduct in rankings scores? University world News. Published February 24, 2024. (News Article)
  122. Reilly I. Public Deception as Ideological and Institutional Critique: On the Limits and Possibilities of Academic Hoaxing. Canadian Journal of Communication. 2020;45(2). doi:10.22230/cjc.2020v45n2a3667
  123. Reville W. 20204. The credibility crisis in science. The Irish Times. Published on March 21, 2024. (News Article)
  124. Ribeiro MD, Vasconcelos S. Should corrections of the literature influence grant review? PsyArXiv Preprints. 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/49vpa.
  125. Robert JS. 2024. Should research administrators be regulated as carefully as researchers? Bioessays. Published online on March 27, 2024 ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202300196
  126. Rodionov V. April 11, 2024. Holes in the ‘holey graphyne’ story. Chemistry World. https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/holes-in-the-holey-graphyne-story/4019235.article (Magazine Article)
  127. Rodriguez-Ramallo H, Báez-Gutiérrez N, Aparicio Castellano B. 2024. 6ER-015 Retracted pharmacology articles: a cross-sectional study using the retraction watch database. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 31:A231. (Conference Abstract – Research)
  128. Sacco DF, Namuth AJ, Macchione AL, Brown M. 2024. Differences in Support for Retractions Based on Information Hazards Among Undergraduates and Federally Funded Scientists. Journal of Academic Ethics. Published online before print. 10.1007/s10805-024-09505-y (Journal Article – Review)
  129. Schneider J, Ye D, Hill AM, et al. Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data. Scientometrics. 2020;125: 2877–2913. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03631-1
  130. Schindler D, Yan E, Spors S, Krüger F. 2023. Retracted articles use less free and open-source software and cite it worse. Quantitative Science Studies. 4(4): 820–838. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00275 (Journal Article – Research)
  131. Siegerink B, Pet LA, Rosendaal FR, Erkens MYHG. 2023. The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678 (Journal Article – Research)
  132. Sinder J. Correcting the Record: Law Journals and Scholarly Integrity in the Digital Age. Social Science Research Network; 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3521475
  133. Singh A, Botros M, Guirguis P, Punreddy A, Mesfin A, Puvanesarajah V. 2024. Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends in Retracted Spine Literature: 2000–2023. World Neurosurgery. In Press: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.080. (Journal Article – Research)
  134. Smith EM. Reimagining the peer-review system for translational health science journals. Clinical and Translational Science. 2021. doi:10.1111/cts.13050
  135. Soltani P, Patini R. Retracted COVID-19 articles: a side-effect of the hot race to publication. Scientometrics. 2020;125(1):819-822. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03661-9
  136. Sotudeh H, Barahmand N, Yousefi Z, Yaghtin M. How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition. Journal of Information Science. Published online July 29, 2020:0165551520945853. doi:10.1177/0165551520945853
  137. Spieseke M (2021). Retraction Watch oder „Bitte nicht zitieren!“. Free University of Berlin Library Blog. 14 December. (News Article – Blog post)
  138. Sra MS, Arora M, Mazumder A, Goyal RM, Parameswaran G. Meena JK (2022). Comparative analysis of retracted pre-print and peer-reviewed articles on COVID-19. medRxiv. (Preprint – Research)
  139. Stamm T. From honest mistakes to fake news – approaches to correcting the scientific literature. Head & Face Medicine. 2020;16(1):6. doi:10.1186/s13005-020-00220-8 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  140. Suelzer EM, Deal J, Hanus KL, Ruggeri B, Sieracki R, Witkowski E. Assessment of Citations of the Retracted Article by Wakefield et al With Fraudulent Claims of an Association Between Vaccination and Autism. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(11):e1915552-e1915552. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15552 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  141. Svare BB. A Cautionary Tale for Psychology and Higher Education in Asia: Following Western Practices of Incentivising Scholarship May Have Negative Outcomes. Psychology and Developing Societies. 2020;32(1):94-121. doi:10.1177/0971333619900043 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  142. Svarstad J. 2023. Norges mest publiserende forsker ble frikjent for juks. Nå er 12 av artiklene hans flagget [Norway’s most published researcher was acquitted of cheating. Now 12 of his articles have been flagged]. Kunnskapsavisen Khrono. May 15, 2023. (News Article)
  143. Szakal FD (2021). Retracting publications doesn’t stop them from influencing science. Massive Science. 15 March. (News Article)
  144. Szilagyi I-S, Schittek G, Klivinyi C, Simonis H, Ulrich T, Bornemann-Cimenti H (2022). Citation of retracted research: a case-controlled, ten-year follow-up scientometric analysis of Scott S. Reuben’s malpractice. Scientometics. 127, 2611–2620. (Journal Article – Research)
  145. Tao W, Yong-Hong L, Xing Q-R (2020). Characteristics of retracted systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the biomedical literature. Research Square. (Preprint – Research)
  146. Trejo-Pech CO, Thach SV, Thompson JM, Manley J. 2021. Violations of Standard Practices by Predatory Economics Journals, Serials Review, doi: 10.1080/00987913.2021.1959183 (Journal Article – Research)
  147. Tucker R (2020). Substandard COVID-19 research is cause for concern. Hospital Healthcare Europe. 12 October. (News Article – Editorial)
  148. UK Committee on Research Integrity. 2023. Research Integrity in the UK: Annual statement 2023. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8117154 (Government Report)
  149. Urban MC, Merow C, Wegrzyn JL, Maitner BS, Corcoran D (2021). How to publish at pandemic speed. BioScience. 71(10), 1001-1003. (Journal Article – Editorial)
  150. Valdez D, Goodson P. Language Bias in Health Research: External Factors That Influence Latent Language Patterns. Front Res Metr Anal. 2020;5. doi:10.3389/frma.2020.00004 (Journal Article – Research)
  151. Van Der Walt W, WIllems KA, Friedrich W, Hatus S, Krauss (2020). Retracted COVID-19 papers and the levels of ‘citation pollution’: A preliminary analysis and directions for further research. Cahiers de la Documentation. 2020(3-4). (Journal Article – Research)
  152. Van Noorden R. 2021. Hundreds of gibberish papers still lurk in the scientific literature. Nature. 594, 160-161. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01436-7 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  153. Van Noorden R. 2023. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature, 624, 479-481. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8. (Journal Article – Editorial)
  154. van Schalkwyk F, Dudek J (2022). Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science. 31(5). (Journal Article – Research)
  155. Voormolen S (2022). Studie over zonneschijnvitamine gaat ten onder. NRC. 29 April. (News Article)
  156. Wadhwa RR, Rasendran C, Popovic ZB, Nissen SE, Desai MY. 2021. Temporal Trends, Characteristics, and Citations of Retracted Articles in Cardiovascular Medicine. JAMA Network Open. 4(7):e2118263. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18263
  157. Wager E, Kleinert S, et al., on behalf of the CLUE Working Group. et al. Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(6). doi:10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3
  158. Waltman L, Pinfield S, Rzayeva N, Oliveira Herigues S, Fang Z,….Swaminathan S (2021). Scholarly communication in times of crisis: The response of the scholarly communication system to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17125394.v1 (Report)
  159. Wang T, Yong Hong L, Xing QR. Characteristics of retracted systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the biomedical literature. Research Square. July 21, 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-45086/v1 (Preprint – Research)
  160. Wang P, Su J. 2022. Expert-recommended biomedical journal articles: Their retractions or corrections, and post-retraction citing. Journal of Information Science. doi: 10.1177/01655515221074329 (Journal Article – Research)
  161. Weitzman, H (2021). A way out of the replication crisis. Chicago Booth Review. 16 March. (News Article)
  162. Wentao L, Mol BW (2019). Re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG. 126(10), 1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15829 (Journal Article – Letter to the Editor)
  163. West JD, Bergstrom CT. Misinformation in and about science. PNAS. 2021;118(15):e1912444117. doi:10.1073/pnas.1912444117 (Journal Article -Commentary/Editorial)
  164. Willinsky J, Pimentel D. The publication facts label: A public and professional guide for research articles. Learned Publishing. Early View published 2/21/2024. doi:10.1002/leap.1599
  165. Xu H, Ding Y, Zhang C, Tan BYC. 2023. Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articles. Research Policy. 52(7):104815. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104815 ((Journal Article – Research)
  166. Xu S, Hu G (2022). Retraction stigma and its communication via retraction notices. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09465-w (Journal Article – Research)
  167. Yang S, Qi F, Diao H, Ajiferukea A (2022). Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 (Journal Article – Research)
  168. Yarborough M. Using the concept of “deserved trust” to strengthen the value and integrity of biomedical research. Account Res. 2020. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1855427 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  169. Young RG, Mitterboeck TF. Perspectives for early-career researchers on plagiarism and scientific integrity. FACETS. Published online January 13, 2020. doi:10.1139/facets-2019-0031 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  170. Yousafzai A (2021). Fraudulent research thriving in Pakistan due to HEC’s apathy. The New International. 25 October. (News Article)
  171. Yumru M, Herdi O (2022). The death decree of a scientific paper: Retraction. Turkish Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 25(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2022.35545 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  172. Zhao Y, Anand, Ajay; Sharma, Gaurav (2021): Reviewer Recommendations Using Document Vector Embeddings and a Publisher Database: Implementation and Evaluation. TechRxiv. (Preprint – Research/Review)
  173. Zheng X, Chen J, Tollas A, Ni C. 2023. The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions. Journal of Informetrics. 17(3):101423. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101423 (Journal Article – Research)
  174. Zhu H, Jia Y, Leung S. Citations of microRNA Biomarker Articles That Were Retracted: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e243173. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3173 (Journal Article – Review)
  175. Zietman AL, Yom SS, Braverman LC. Making Sure Retractions Matter. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2019;103(5):1043-1044. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.001 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  176. Zuckerman H. Is “the time ripe” for quantitative research on misconduct in science? Quantitative Science Studies. 2020;1(3):945-958. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00065. Erratum, 2020(1):1653. (Journal Article – Editorial/Review)

Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at team@retractionwatch.com.