Before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do you enjoy our weekly roundup? If so, we could really use your help. Would you consider a tax-deductible donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work ? Thanks in advance.
The week at Retraction Watch featured revelations about a
Harvard lab being investigated by federal officials; a researcher who blamed a dead colleague for plagiarism; and the retraction of a paper on mindfulness. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Ousted at MD Anderson; an “under-recognized variety of plagiarism;” a data thug rolls again
Sam W. Lee, a Harvard researcher — or perhaps former Harvard researcher — who has lost three papers to retraction , including one from Nature , now has an expression of concern for another article, this one in Molecular and Cellular Biology .
The notice for that paper, 2000’s “Overexpression of Kinase-Associated Phosphatase (KAP) in Breast and Prostate Cancer and Inhibition of the Transformed Phenotype by Antisense KAP Expression,” reads: Continue reading Harvard cancer lab subject to federal misconduct probe
A University of Cambridge researcher —
Steve Jackson — and a former researcher at the University of Bristol — Abderrahmane Kaidi — have accomplished a two-fer: Retracting a paper in Nature, and one in Science, on the same day.
In September of last year, the BBC
reported that Kaidi was resigning “after admitting that he fabricated his research.” The Times reported that “Dr Kaidi’s admission came during a separate inquiry into complaints about his treatment of colleagues.” The university told the BBC at the time: Continue reading Authors have papers in Nature and Science retracted on the same day
Dear Retraction Watch readers:
Maybe you’re a researcher who likes keeping up with developments in scientific integrity. Maybe you’re a reporter who has found a story idea on the blog. Maybe you’re an ethics instructor who uses the site to find case studies. Or a publisher who uses our blog to screen authors who submit manuscripts — we know at least two who do.
Whether you fall into one of those categories or another, we
need your help. Continue reading Retraction Watch readers, we need your help to be able to continue our work
Tamsin Edwards was stunned. And hurt .
On the afternoon of Friday, April 5, Edwards had just learned that her blog, “ All Models Are Wrong ,” had disappeared from the PLOS Blogs Network, where it was hosted. No warning. No communication from PLOS.
So Edwards, a climate scientist at King’s College, London , tweeted: Continue reading With a badly handled tweet, PLOS angers scientists after a blog disappears
Last year a Beijing doctor said he was “speechless” after reading a study.
The study in question, published in Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion in 2017, was titled “Discussion on quantum entanglement theory and acupuncture.” Dr. Zeng, the Beijing doctor, was among a number of critics quoted in September 2018 by What’s On Weibo , which reports on social media happenings in China: Continue reading Article claiming acupuncture on parents would treat their kids through quantum entanglement has been retracted
The former president of Tohoku University in Japan has just had a tenth paper retracted, because it duplicated one of his earlier works.
One of the
most recent retractions by materials scientist Akihisa Inoue, late last month, was of a paper in Materials Transactions that had duplicated a now-retracted paper and was subject to an expression of concern in 2012: Continue reading Former university president up to ten retractions
In what seems like another entry in our occasional “ Retraction Watch Mad Libs” series, Elsevier has withdrawn a paper that claimed to link the aluminum in vaccines to behavioral changes in sheep.
The paper, which
appeared online in in November of last year, was swiftly picked up by antivaccine advocates such as Celeste McGovern, whose article about it was Pharmacological Research posted on Children’s Health Defense, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr’s, site.
But it also earned harsh criticism from
Skeptical Raptor and Orac, who called it Continue reading Here we go again: Paper linking vaccines to cognitive damage (in sheep) retracted