Sigh: “The purpose of keeping these retraction notices slim is not to produce too much detail”
Regular readers of this blog by now know that one of our goals is to make retractions as open and informative as possible. Which is why when they’re not, we get irritated that not everyone seems to agree. Consider the editors of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, which this month has retracted two papers from a … Continue reading Sigh: “The purpose of keeping these retraction notices slim is not to produce too much detail”