Kenji Okajima retraction count grows to five

We’ve been following the case of Kenji Okajima, a professor at Nagoya City University in Japan who was suspended for six months following an investigation into work in his lab. Bits of the story — including at least one other university investigation, and scrutiny of Okajima’s colleagues, one of whom was fired — have been … Continue reading Kenji Okajima retraction count grows to five

Is defining plagiarism “like catching smoke in a butterfly net?” Towson professor under investigation

Earlier this month, we brought you the story of a paper in a journal about business ethics being retracted for — wait for it — plagiarism. The paper that seemed to be the one in question — see the post for why that was a bit unclear — was by Benjamin A. Neil, a professor … Continue reading Is defining plagiarism “like catching smoke in a butterfly net?” Towson professor under investigation

Geneticists take HeLa sequence off-line after Lacks family notes they hadn’t given consent

HeLa — the cell line that has apparently taken over any number of others commonly used in science, suggesting that many researchers may not have been studying what they thought they were studying — is back in the news. This weekend, it was the DNA sequence of the cells that’s made headlines, with a quiet … Continue reading Geneticists take HeLa sequence off-line after Lacks family notes they hadn’t given consent

Cardiologist accused of misconduct strikes back in a journal

Retraction Watch readers may recall the case of Don Poldermans, a prominent Dutch cardiology researcher who left a research position in late 2011 amid an investigation into his work. In a letter in the American Journal of Medicine titled “Scientific Fraud or a Rush to Judgement?” Poldermans — three of whose papers are subject to … Continue reading Cardiologist accused of misconduct strikes back in a journal

Lance Armstrong in the scientific literature: A “reconsideration”

In January, as Lance Armstrong was performing the 21st century version of a confessional — appearing on Oprah — we wrote about a 2005 paper in the Journal of Applied Physiology about a “bicyclist who has now become the six-time consecutive Grand Champion of the Tour de France.” That paper was, of course, about Armstrong, … Continue reading Lance Armstrong in the scientific literature: A “reconsideration”

Could the sequester mean more business for Retraction Watch?

Consider this a bit of a thought experiment, but hear us out. The National Institutes of Health earlier this month notified the scientists it funds that, thanks to the sequester, many may soon face cuts in those grants as the agency tries to deal with a reduction in its $30.9 billion budget. In her March … Continue reading Could the sequester mean more business for Retraction Watch?

More HeLa problems: For decades, a widely used bladder cancer line hasn’t been what scientists thought

About a year ago, we wrote about the retraction of a paper in Oral Oncology that highlighted a big issue in oncology research: Widespread contamination of cancer cell lines by other lines, making findings difficult to interpret. One of the common contaminants is HeLa cells. HeLa, of course, stands for Henrietta Lacks, the subject of … Continue reading More HeLa problems: For decades, a widely used bladder cancer line hasn’t been what scientists thought

Oh, the irony: Business ethics journal paper retracted for plagiarism

Is this the new business ethics? In January, we reported on a paper retracted from the Journal of Business Ethics for duplication. That earned the author a five-year publishing ban. This week, we learned of a case of plagiarism in another journal in the field, the Journal of Academic and Business Ethics. Here’s an email … Continue reading Oh, the irony: Business ethics journal paper retracted for plagiarism

“What I find offensive is not that they plagiarized us, it’s that they did it so badly”

Retraction Watch readers may be familiar with the work of Brian Nosek, a University of Virginia psychologist who has taken a tough stance about many of the problems in his field and coordinates the Reproducibility Project. So it must have seemed quite ironic for Nosek and his co-authors to learn today that one of their … Continue reading “What I find offensive is not that they plagiarized us, it’s that they did it so badly”

Wash U psychologist sheds light on inquiry against former psychology grad student

On Tuesday, we reported on the case of Adam Savine, a former graduate student at Washington University in St. Louis who was found by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) to have committed misconduct. Today, Blythe Bernhard, of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, has an illuminating Q and A with Todd Braver, whose lab Savine worked … Continue reading Wash U psychologist sheds light on inquiry against former psychology grad student