Here’s a rather odd case: When readers raised issues about some of the images in a 2008 cancer paper, the authors issued a correction last year. But when readers asked additional questions about the corrected images, the authors decided to retract the paper entirely, along with its correction.
Both the original and corrected versions were questioned on PubPeer.
Here’s the retraction notice for the 2008 article “PRIMA-1MET induces mitochondrial apoptosis through activation of caspase-2,” published in Oncogene, which includes a link to the July 2016 correction: Continue reading Huh? Cancer paper gets retracted because of its correction
A group of researchers in France has been forced to retract their 2002 article in the
It would seem that resorting to legal means to avoid editorial notices doesn’t always work.
Pfizer has retracted a paper by a former employee who was fired after the company discovered she had been doctoring data.

The notices keep coming for diabetes researcher 