Chemistry researchers in China have retracted their 2016 paper after reporting that the raw data did not match what they presented in the article.
The authors were attempting to develop a method to produce large amounts of a high-quality two-dimensional form of antimonene, a prized crystal structure that has been notoriously difficult to synthesize reliably.
They were successful, according to the paper, achieving “a large quantity of few-layer antimonene” and demonstrating its “exact atomical structure” and properties.
But they may have spoken too soon. Continue reading Why don’t the raw data match what was reported in a chemistry paper?



Here’s a rather odd case: When readers raised issues about some of the images in a 2008 cancer paper, the authors issued a correction last year. But when
A group of researchers in France has been forced to retract their 2002 article in the
It would seem that resorting to legal means to avoid editorial notices doesn’t always work.
Pfizer has retracted a paper by a former employee who was fired after the company discovered she had been doctoring data.
