Skip to content

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Get Retraction Watch in your inbox

Get our Newsletter

Get the latest news from Retraction Watch and beyond Monday through Friday, plus Weekend Reads each Saturday.

Support Retraction Watch

Retraction Watch Lists

  • The Retraction Watch Leaderboard
  • Retractions by Nobel Prize winners
  • Top 10 most highly cited retracted papers
  • The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List
  • The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker
  • Papers and peer reviews with evidence of ChatGPT writing
  • Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers

Search Retraction Watch

Retraction Watch Database

  • Database User Guide
  • View the Database

About Retraction Watch

  • Meet the Retraction Watch staff
    • About Adam Marcus
    • About Ivan Oransky
  • Job opportunities
  • Retraction Watch Research Accountability Reporting Fellowship
  • Retraction Watch journalism internship
  • The Center for Scientific Integrity
  • The Ctrl-Z Award
  • The Retraction Watch FAQ, including comments policy
  • Papers that cite Retraction Watch
  • What people are saying about Retraction Watch
  • Invite us to speak

Recent Comments

  • Kathleen McMillan on Researcher claims his case report was stolen by someone else at his hospital
  • adams on NEJM retracts case study for AI-manipulated imagery
  • Buzz on Black marks on published papers don’t change citation rates, new study finds

Archives

Patients Like Me privacy breach complaint sinks paper

A journal has removed a paper after realizing it contained a verbatim quote from a patient that could reveal the patient’s identity. Reposting as our subscription software appears to be acting up again. Read the whole post here.

Share this:

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X

Related

Posted on September 15, 2016September 15, 2016Author Ivan OranskyCategories Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Social networking site privacy breach complaint prompts retraction
Next Next post: Correction cites “unreliable” data in paper by researchers at center of Duke lawsuit
Privacy policy Proudly powered by WordPress