About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘plant biology’ Category

Following “personal attacks and threats,” Elsevier plant journal makes author persona non grata

with 76 comments

Scientia HorticulturaeAn Elsevier journal has taken “the exceptional step of ceasing to communicate” with a scientist-critic after a series of “unfounded personal attacks and threats.” The move means that the journal, Scientia Horticulturae, will not review any papers that include the critic, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, as an author.

Here is the text of the letter (pdf here, obtained from an anonymous source), signed by Gert Jan-Geraeds:

Read the rest of this entry »

About these ads

Written by ivanoransky

April 10, 2014 at 1:52 pm

Following up: Pamela Ronald publishes updated data following two retractions

with 3 comments

Pamela Ronald, via UC Davis

Pamela Ronald, via UC Davis

Last year, we wrote about two retractions by Pamela Ronald and colleagues, after the group found that a bacterial strain they’d been using was contaminated.

The group has now published a paper in PeerJ following their investigation into what went wrong. Ronald tells us the new paper, titled “The Xanthomonas Ax21 protein is processed by the general secretory system and is secreted in association with outer membrane vesicles,” Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

January 14, 2014 at 9:30 am

Posted in plant biology

Another correction appears for husband-wife team found to have manipulated images

with 7 comments

insectAlejandra Bravo and Mario Soberon, a wife-husband research team at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) who received sanctions — later lifted — for manipulating images in a number of papers have corrected another article.

The paper, “The mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 is involved in insect defense against Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis,” appeared in Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in 2010 and has been cited 23 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge. Here’s the correction notice: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

November 26, 2013 at 9:30 am

Spying on The Onion: Journal retracts drone paper for duplication

with 5 comments

euro j agronomyWhen you think of drones, you probably think of deadly strikes in faraway lands. But what about studying crops?

Take “Use of digital photography from unmanned aerial vehicles for estimation of leaf area index in onion (Allium cepa L.),” a study published earlier this year in the European Journal of Agronomy by researchers from Spain: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

November 8, 2013 at 9:30 am

Chopping broccoli: Researchers lose paper on florets after readers raise questions

with 13 comments

b&mclWith apologies to Dana Carvey, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters has chopped a 2012 paper on the molecular constituents of broccoli florets after readers evidently were forced to do the job of reviewers and point out fatal flaws in the study.

The article, “Two novel bioactive glucosinolates from Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) florets,” came from a group in South Korea and has yet to be cited, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge. But according to the retraction notice, after publication critics pointed out serious problems with the work. To wit: Read the rest of this entry »

Plant journal retracts paper for plagiarism — of another study in the same journal

with 5 comments

s horticulturaeScientia Horticulturae, a plant journal published by Elsevier, has retracted a paper after realizing it was a graft of another that appeared in its pages.

Here’s the notice for “Water stress effects on Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) yield and oil essential components,” by Farshid Vazin, Islamic Azad University, Gonabad, Iran: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 30, 2013 at 11:00 am

Image manipulation leads to fifth retraction for plant research group

with 11 comments

plant scienceA plant scientist at the Colorado State University has retracted a fifth paper.

Here’s the notice for “Influence of ATP-binding cassette transporters in root exudation of phytoalexins, signals, and in disease resistance, a paper originally published in July 2012:

The Journal, Chief Editor and the Authors wish to retract the Original Research article cited above in its entirety. Based on information reported after publication, this article was found to have images that were inappropriately manipulated (Figure 1B: actin panel; Figure 6A: PR1, PR5; Figure 6B: AtATH6, AtATH10). The authors and the journal regret the errors and regret any inconvenience to the readers of Frontiers in Plant Science.

The last author of the now-retracted paper, Jorge Vivanco, has had four previous retractions, including one in Nature. He tells us: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 30, 2013 at 9:30 am

“Not exoneration”: University reverses sanctions on husband-wife team found to have manipulated images

with 7 comments

Maria Bravo, via UNAM

Alejandra Bravo, via UNAM

A complicated case involving two microbiology researchers at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) appears to have come to some conclusion.

In November of last year, we reported that Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 28, 2013 at 12:45 pm

Plant journal withdraws paper — or does it?

with 2 comments

mol plantThe temporary withdrawal of a Molecular Plant paper had us scratching our heads, but the issue seems to be explained by a glitch.

If you click on this version of “Application of the CRISPR–Cas System for Efficient Genome Engineering in Plants” (subscription required), you see this:

This paper has been withdrawn pending a decision by the Editorial Board

But that page also says that the latest version of the paper was published on October 3. Clicking on that version sends you to the paper, which begins: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 16, 2013 at 11:30 am

Plant journals uproot duplicate publications that authors used as a hedge

with 6 comments

pmbpA group of researchers in India has lost two articles in the plant literature for shenanigans with duplicate submission.

One article, “Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation and efficient regeneration of a timber yielding plant Dalbergia sissoo Roxb,” appeared online last June in the journal. The authors were from institutions in Orissa.

According to the retraction notice, the paper was a case of “thanks, but no thanks.” What’s worse, the researchers seem to be under the impression that they’ve done nothing wrong. Because they said so. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by amarcus41

September 30, 2013 at 9:30 am


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,184 other followers