The editors of a plant biology journal have retracted a 2007 paper because of “an injustice.”
According to the notice, the editors of Cytologia found evidence of “apparent figure manipulation,” and decided to retract the paper.
This marks the 10th retraction for plant biologist Dibyendu Talukdar.
Talukdar, who is first and corresponding author on the 2007 paper and listed at the University of Calcutta in West Bengal, India, received his first retraction last July, which also cited suspected figure manipulation. Earlier this year, Talukdar received eight more retractions in seven different journals, all describing concerns over potential image duplication and manipulation.
Here’s the most recent retraction notice in Cytologia: Continue reading “There is an injustice in this article”
The troubles continue for a bone researcher, who’s lost multiple papers in recent months due to problems ranging from data issues to including authors without their consent.
Now, journals have retracted two more papers by Yoshihiro Sato. And in a sign of the downstream effects that fraud can have, another journal has retracted two meta-analyses by other authors that cited his work.
Earlier this month, the journal Current Medical Research and Opinion retracted the two meta-analyses because they were based on recently retracted papers by Sato, affiliated with Mitate Hospital. The two new retractions of Sato’s papers are a review and a randomized controlled trial.
Sato was not an author on the meta-analyses published in 2008 and 2011; he was, however, first and lead author on all the retracted papers referenced in the notices. The notices state that the trio of authors on the meta-analyses:
Continue reading Fraud by bone researcher takes down two meta-analyses, a clinical trial, and review