
What would you do if you discovered your name in a list of experts on sex robots despite having never studied sex robots?
That was the situation for one rather panicked researcher who reached out to us in late September after discovering his name among several singled out in a review article for the “greatest number of published works” on sex robots.
Published in February in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, the bibliometric analysis of the field aimed “to provide a clearer understanding of the issues surrounding sex robots,” the original article stated.
Continue reading A peer-reviewed paper claimed a researcher was an expert in sex robots. He’s not.