Did you miss some of this week’s posts? Here they all are, in one handy roundup:
- Are there foxes in Tasmania? Follow the poop
- Lancet retracts (and replaces) paper a year after authors report error that changes “all numbers”
- Lost in translation: Authors blame a language error for wrong diagnosis
- More notices appear for embattled Cornell food researcher
- Author “shocked” after top math journal retracts paper
- “We were devastated:” Authors retract paper after realizing they had used the wrong mice
- Nature retracts paper by stem cell scientist appealing her dismissal
- Nature Chemistry issues its first retraction
- Authors say patient threatened legal action after being subject of scholarly paper
- Leibniz Prize belatedly awarded to scientist cleared of misconduct
- Want to appeal a journal’s rejection? Sure — that’ll be $700
- Volunteer researcher faked weeks’ worth of data
Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on X or Bluesky, like us on Facebook, follow us on LinkedIn, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].