The retraction notice for the study — which appeared in Brain Research Bulletin — cites an investigation by the scientific integrity committee at Tongji University in Shanghai, China, which concluded the authors had engaged in “unethical publishing behavior.”
This article has been retracted at the request of the Scientific Integrity Committee of Tongji University.
After investigation of the original data, experimental procedure and the process of paper submission, the Scientific Integrity Committee of Tongji University concluded that Figure 3A–D, showing voltage–clamp current traces claimed to be representative traces of ClC-2 currents’ in CA1 pyramidal neurons, where actually the averaged currents fraudulently obtained from Bergmann glia as published in Figure 6 in M.B. Hoegg-Beiler, S. Sirisi, T.J. Jentsch, et al. Disrupting MLC1 and GlialCAM and ClC-2 interactions in leukodystrophy entails glial chloride channel dysfunction Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), p. 3475, http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140319/ncomms4475/full/ncomms4475.html
The Editor-in-Chief and Publisher take their duty of guardianship over the scholarly record extremely seriously. Claiming results from research conducted by others constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
We’ve contacted Yu-Xing Ge, the study’s first and corresponding author from the Tongji University Affiliated Tenth People’s Hospital. We also called a representative at Tongji University for further information about their investigation, but were limited in our inability to speak Chinese.
We’ll update the post with anything else we learn.
Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here.