Retraction published for nutrition researcher Marion Nestle

journal_pubhealthFollowing her request last month, a public health journal has retracted a paper co-authored by prominent nutrition researcher Marion Nestle, after revelations of multiple factual errors and her co-author’s ties to one of the subjects of the article.

The article, an opinion piece, critiqued the supposed relationship between the biggest beverage distributor in Guatemala and the leading Guatemala-based public health organization, to distribute a fortified supplement (Manì+) for undernourished children. The relationship, the piece argued, raised concerns about the conflicts of interest that can occur when a food company pairs with a public health organization. But soon after publication, Nestle learned that she and her co-author Joaquin Barnoya had misrepresented that relationship, and failed to disclose that the public health organization was paying a portion of Barnoya’s salary.

Here’s the full retraction notice, published earlier this month by the Journal of Public Health Policy:

The Authors, Editors and Publisher, following complaints from two parties, Edward Fischer and Carolina Siu Bermúdez, have investigated the circumstances around the publication of the Viewpoint entitled ‘The food industry and conflicts of interest in nutrition research: A Latin American perspective’ by Joaquin Barnoya and Marion Nestle (2015) (available, which published online in the journal on 29 October 2015. The findings below are sufficient cause to retract the article and readers are advised that it should no longer be cited from the Journal of Public Health Policy.

The Editors’ investigation into the complaints has revealed the following:

  1. The Authors failed to disclose a competing interest when they submitted the manuscript. As the Viewpoint is, among other things, about the role of the Central American Nutrition Institute (INCAP), failing to disclose the relationship between Dr Barnoya and INCAP (as Principal Investigator on a training grant for which INCAP was the recipient institution) was a serious omission.
  2. The Viewpoint includes an incomplete and inaccurate reference. The inaccurate citation is material, as the authors intended the whole argument presented in the Viewpoint to rely exclusively on the Advertorial cited as reference #1. A correct reference would read as follows: Alianza Contra la Desnutricion. elPeriódico. 23 July 2015; Advertising: 9; this might have been supplemented with a subtitle to read: ALIANZA CONTRA LA DESNUTRION: INCAP, cbc y Fundación Shalom firman convenio de cooperatión. (ADVERTORIAL). The authors may have compounded readers’ potential confusion by failing to cite the Advertorial later in the Viewpoint where they base their statements solely on their understanding of the Advertorial.
  3. The authors presented and now acknowledge a factual error. Their statement in the Viewpoint that “the Central American Bottling Corp…. is involved in the manufacture and distribution of Manì+” is not correct.
  4. Characterizations by the authors based solely on the Advertorial and not cross-checked against other sources for accuracy could mislead readers to reach erroneous conclusions, for example, about the role of INCAP (it did not receive any funding from cbc), or about cbc’s role in distributing Maní+ (it purchased the product, but did not have any other role in distribution).

Despite the serious failures of rigor and precision, the Editors find no persuasive evidence that the Authors intended to harm the reputation of Maní+ or INCAP and the authors would like to apologise for the lack of clarity and errors in the Viewpoint.

The Authors as well as Edward Fischer and Carolina Siu Bermúdez have requested this retraction.

Nestle earned a spot in our “doing the right thing” club for her speedy and transparent decision-making here, which you can read more about on her blog.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, and sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post. Click here to review our Comments Policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.