Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Weekend reads: How to prove (and find) false claims; confessions of a wasteful scientist

with 7 comments

booksThis week at Retraction Watch featured what may be a record for plagiarism, a paper retracted because the device researchers claimed to use hadn’t arrive in the institution yet, and a technical glitch, which meant you may have missed some of our posts. Here’s what was happening elsewhere:

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our new daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here.

Written by Ivan Oransky

June 4th, 2016 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Comments