
Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- Did Flint water crisis set kids back in school? Paper saying so is ‘severely flawed,’ say critics
- Exclusive: Kavli prize winner threatens to sue critic for defamation
- Scopus is broken – just look at its literature category
- Supplement maker sues critic for defamation, spurring removal of accepted abstract
- ‘Mistakes were made’: Paper by department chair earns expression of concern as more questioned
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 400. There are more than 49,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 250 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List — or our list of nearly 100 papers with evidence they were written by ChatGPT?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: The world’s most cited cat; ‘Is peer review failing its peer review?’; Oxford prof accused of stealing research