Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work? Thanks in advance.
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- ‘This is really ridiculous’: An author admitted plagiarism. His supervisor asked for a retraction. The publisher said, “nah.”
- University of Rochester cancer researchers included ‘incorrect images’ in 13 papers, committee finds
- Cancer journal with hefty retraction record retracts another 15
- Authors unhappy as “battlefield acupuncture” paper earns an expression of concern
- Paper on ‘language reclamation’ and decolonization plagiarized from eight papers, journal acknowledges
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up to 206. There are now more than 32,000 retractions in our database — which now powers retraction alerts in EndNote, Papers, and Zotero. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: A museum of scientific misconduct?; authorship misconduct; uproar over renamed phyla