Did you miss some of this week’s posts? Here they all are, in one handy roundup:
- Are there foxes in Tasmania? Follow the poop
- Lancet retracts (and replaces) paper a year after authors report error that changes “all numbers”
- Lost in translation: Authors blame a language error for wrong diagnosis
- More notices appear for embattled Cornell food researcher
- Author “shocked” after top math journal retracts paper
- “We were devastated:” Authors retract paper after realizing they had used the wrong mice
- Nature retracts paper by stem cell scientist appealing her dismissal
- Nature Chemistry issues its first retraction
- Authors say patient threatened legal action after being subject of scholarly paper
- Leibniz Prize belatedly awarded to scientist cleared of misconduct
- Want to appeal a journal’s rejection? Sure — that’ll be $700
- Volunteer researcher faked weeks’ worth of data
Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here.