Drunk rats paper wasted by “significant statistical errors”, among other issues

MolBiolRep_ak5Authors from Xinxiang Medical University in Weihui, China, are retracting a 2014 paper in Molecular Biology Reports because… well, because lots of things.

The researchers exposed nine rats to acute levels of alcohol then compared them to unexposed mice rats, noting differences in gene expression and molecular pathways.

But no one is toasting these findings anymore. Here are the details behind the retraction, courtesy of the notice:

The article “Identification of gene expression profile in the rat brain resulting from acute alcohol intoxication”, published in Mol Biol Rep, (2014, 41:8303–8317, DOI 10.1007/s11033-014-3731-3), is retracted by agreement between the authors and the Editor in Chief. Consent for publication was not provided by all of the participants in the main research group; in addition the original experimental data was matched to incorrect rat samples, and significant statistical errors were found in the Results section.

The article has not been cited.

We’ve contacted the journal’s editor-in-chief and the paper’s corresponding author for more details but have not yet received a reply.

Hat tip: Rolf Degen

Like Retraction Watch? Consider supporting our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, and sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post.

2 thoughts on “Drunk rats paper wasted by “significant statistical errors”, among other issues”

  1. I’m puzzled as to why a paper compared rats to mice. “The researchers exposed nine rats to acute levels of alcohol then compared them to unexposed mice, noting differences in gene expression and molecular pathways.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.