About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘uk retractions’ Category

Quickest withdrawal ever? Journal yanks paper alleging 800K deaths from Poldermans affair

with 9 comments

ehj Just 48 hours after publishing an article by Graham Cole and Darrel Francis last week alleging that Don Poldermans‘ scientific misconduct led to the deaths of some 800,000 Europeans over the past five years by tainting clinical guidelines, the European Heart Journal unceremoniously pulled the paper from its website Friday.

Larry Husten at CardioBrief has been on top of the story. According to Husten: Read the rest of this entry »

About these ads

Book by leading biologist Lewis Wolpert withdrawn from sale for plagiarism

with 9 comments

via UCL

Lewis Wolpert, via UCL

A 2011 book by Lewis Wolpert, one of the world’s leading developmental biologists, has been pulled from shelves for plagiarism.

The Guardian reports that the book, You’re Looking Very Well,

…has been found…to contain more than 20 passages that have been taken directly from academic papers, websites and Wikipedia with no indication that they were penned by any author other than Wolpert himself. The book has now been withdrawn from sale.

The newspaper notes that this was not Wolpert’s first plagiarism offense: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 19, 2014 at 12:23 pm

Posted in uk retractions

“Stupid, it should not be done that way”: Researcher explains how duplications led to a retraction

with 25 comments


Rienk van Grondelle, via VU

More than two years ago, we wrote about a retraction for duplication in Biophysical Journal prompted by an email from pseudonymous whistleblower Clare Francis. That post generated a robust discussion, including one comment from someone calling himself or herself “Double Dutch.”

This past weekend, the last author of that paper, Rienk van Grondelle, left a lengthy response to that comment in which he explained how the duplication happened. We’ve confirmed that it was van Grondelle who left the comment, which we reproduce here in full (we’ve added paragraph breaks for readability): Read the rest of this entry »

Fourth retraction results from Cardiff investigation

with 3 comments

mol immResearchers have retracted a fourth paper following an investigation at Cardiff University that found evidence of image manipulation by a researcher named Rossen Donev.

Here’s the notice for “The mouse complement regulator CD59b is significantly expressed only in testis and plays roles in sperm acrosome activation and motility,” a paper first published in Molecular Immunology in 2008: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 6, 2014 at 9:30 am

Failure to reproduce result leads to disputed retraction

with 7 comments

BJ_logoA research group in Scotland has retracted a paper in the Biochemical Journal after failed attempts to reproduce a key finding of the study.

Here’s the notice: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

December 18, 2013 at 9:30 am

Lack of ethical clearance prompts expression of concern from bone journal

with 3 comments

jbjsThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery has issued an expression of concern about a paper whose authors may not have obtained proper ethical clearance.

Here’s the notice, signed by editor in chief Vernon Tolo: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

December 2, 2013 at 9:30 am

Cell update: Co-corresponding author let go from Belgian university; retraction notice language changed

with 28 comments

cell november 2013We’ve learned more about the circumstances behind a Cell retraction that we covered last week.

First, one of the two corresponding authors left the institution where he most recently worked. Belgium’s VIB Ghent told us that Pankaj Dhonukshe was no longer employed there and said: Read the rest of this entry »

Authors retract Cell paper amid ongoing investigation

with 22 comments

cell november 2013The authors of a 2012 paper in Cell have retracted it after discovering “serious issues with several figures.”

Here’s the notice for “A PLETHORA-Auxin Transcription Module Controls Cell Division Plane Rotation through MAP65 and CLASP:” Read the rest of this entry »

A third retraction stemming from Cardiff investigations

leave a comment »

cancer research 1113We’ve been reporting on retractions of research published by Cardiff University scientists following an investigation into their work. On Monday, we noted a new retraction of work by the group in Cancer Research, which we thought was the second retraction following one in the Journal of Immunology in 2011. But it turns out there was another retraction published at the same time in the same journal, which we now know about thanks to commenter David Hardman and PubPeer.

Here’s the notice: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

November 13, 2013 at 6:30 am

Former Cardiff researcher found guilty of misconduct “very disappointed,” calls process “unprofessional”

with 4 comments

cardiffYesterday, we reported on the second retraction in a case at Cardiff University, which had found misconduct by a former scientist. Cancer Research, which published the retraction, said that scientist, Rossen Donev, could not be reached.

Donev responded to our request for comment this morning: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

November 12, 2013 at 7:00 am

Posted in uk retractions


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33,783 other followers