About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Weekend reads: How to rescue science, what “censorship” really means, worst paper of the year?

with 2 comments

booksAnother very busy week at Retraction Watch. There were a lot of gems elsewhere. Here’s a sampling:

Like Retraction Watch? Consider supporting our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, and sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post.

About these ads

Written by Ivan Oransky

April 19, 2014 at 10:11 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. There has also been a conversation started on PubMed Commons about the PNAS “Rescue American Biomedical Science” paper by Dorthy Bishop, myself, and L Charles Murtaugh: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24733905#cm24733905_4012

    Allison (@DrStelling)

    April 19, 2014 at 10:32 am

  2. Here’s an 11 page errata of the weirdest blog around.
    This Kaiser bloke who is a creationist scientist, (is there such a ting), wants to disband the zoological code and rename about 600 species, genera and tribes named by his arch enemy.
    After being outed for evidence free taxononmy, Kaiser’s eaten come huble pie and printed the 11 page “errata” here


    Samuel Blair

    July 1, 2014 at 9:08 pm

We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35,813 other followers

%d bloggers like this: