Category: pubpeer selections

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: Male vs. female brains, health care serial killers, corrections on the way

Late last week, Nature reported some details of PubPeer’s fight against a subpoena from a researcher who claims to have lost a job because of comments on the site. (Background here.) Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: From “this comment is clearly unfounded” to “happy to elaborate,” a range of responses

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: Corrections in PNAS, PLOS Pathogens after PubPeer critiques; how old is too old?

This week we learned that Fazlul Sarkar, who is suing PubPeer commenters, claiming he lost a job offer at the University of Mississippi because of their critiques, declined an opportunity to respond to said comments. Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: Authors respond to critiques; motorcycling meets photonics; soda and aging

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: On an “immodest title;” authors recalculate findings in response to questions

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: More stem cell questions; “is the hassle of a correction really needed?”

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: PubPeer comments lead to Science correction; crystal structure in triplicate

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: PubPeer comments prompt investigation; Memory of water returns?

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: Sniffing at a dog poop paper; how grants should be distributed

Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections: Continue reading PubPeer Selections: Was a Nature correction adequate?; Use of samples from patients with COPD questioned