Meet the founder of a 100,000-strong Facebook group driving change in scientific integrity in Vietnam

Van Tu Duong

Retraction Watch readers may have noticed an uptick of items in the RW Daily and Weekend Reads about scientific integrity issues in Vietnam over the past year. Many of those items had their genesis, and were circulated, on a Facebook group that now has close to 100,000 members — and was recently removed temporarily by Facebook. We asked Van Tu Duong, a researcher at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, who founded the group, to tell us more about the history of the effort. This email interview has been lightly edited for flow and clarity.

Tell us about this history of the group. Why did you find it, and when?

Continue reading Meet the founder of a 100,000-strong Facebook group driving change in scientific integrity in Vietnam

Cambridge researcher pulls Cell paper five years after Nature, Science retractions

A cancer researcher at the University of Cambridge in the UK has retracted a paper from Cell after commenters on PubPeer questioned aspects of 10 images in the article. 

Steve Jackson

Though an institutional investigation found the figures were “not reliable,” another of the authors objected to the retraction as “an overreaction.”

Steve Jackson, the University of Cambridge biology professor and lab leader, previously retracted two papers – including one in Nature and one in Science posted on the same day – after a Cambridge investigation found a co-author, Abderrahmane Kaidi, had falsified data. 

Continue reading Cambridge researcher pulls Cell paper five years after Nature, Science retractions

Retractions begin for chemist found to have faked data in 42 papers

Naohiro Kameta

A nanotube researcher in Japan has earned 13 retractions, with more to come, after an extensive investigation by the country’s National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) revealed widespread misconduct in his work. 

AIST’s investigation found Naohiro Kameta, senior principal researcher at the Nanomaterials Research Institute located in AIST’s Ibaraki campus, fabricated and falsified dozens of studies. He was apparently dismissed from his role following the findings. 

The institute first learned of the problems in Kameta’s work in November 2022, according to a translated version of the investigation report. Initially, they looked into five papers, but eventually expanded their scrutiny to 61 articles on which Kameta was the lead or responsible author.

Continue reading Retractions begin for chemist found to have faked data in 42 papers

Pain researcher in Italy up to seven retractions

Marco Monticone

A physiatrist in Italy has lost four publications this year after two groups of researchers raised concerns about his research.

The physician, Marco Monticone, a professor at the University of Cagliari, had three papers pulled in 2022, as we reported at the time. Those retractions followed a critique by Cochrane researchers who analyzed data in 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) headed by Monticone.

Neil O’Connell, of Brunel University of London, lead author of the critique, told us:

Continue reading Pain researcher in Italy up to seven retractions

New engineering dean has two retractions for authorship manipulation

Moncef Nehdi

A newly appointed dean at the University of Guelph in Canada has had two papers retracted for “evidence of authorship manipulation.” 

Another article by the researcher, Moncef Nehdi, formerly of McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, seems to match a paper that had its authorship advertised for sale, according to a post on PubPeer. 

Nehdi told Retraction Watch he stands by his group’s work in the two retracted papers, but agreed with the retractions because he thought the investigations “raised some valid concerns.” 

Nehdi began a five-year term as dean of the University of Guelph’s College of Engineering and Physical Sciences on September 1, according to an announcement this spring. The announcement stated: 

Continue reading New engineering dean has two retractions for authorship manipulation

Penn State barred embattled professor from doing research

Deborah Kelly

The Pennsylvania State University in May blocked a prominent professor at the school from doing research and making presentations on its behalf, Retraction Watch has learned. 

The professor, Deborah Kelly, has faced mounting scrutiny over her work since a researcher in the United Kingdom noticed apparent data manipulation in a now-retracted article she published in 2017. Kelly earned her third retraction last week following a university probe that found “serious data integrity concerns” in another paper, as we reported at the time. 

In comments she made via her legal counsel for that story, Kelly, a biomedical engineer and an expert in electron microscopy, told us:

Continue reading Penn State barred embattled professor from doing research

Nobel prize-winner tallies two more retractions, bringing total to 13

Gregg Semenza

A Nobel prize-winning genetics researcher has retracted two more papers, bringing his total to 13. 

Gregg Semenza, a professor of genetic medicine and director of the vascular program at Johns Hopkins’ Institute for Cell Engineering in Baltimore, shared the 2019 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine for “discoveries of how cells sense and adapt to oxygen availability.” 

Since pseudonymous sleuth Claire Francis and others began using PubPeer to point out potential duplicated or manipulated images in Semenza’s work in 2019, the researcher has retracted 12 papers. A previous retraction from 2011 for a paper co-authored with Naoki Mori – who with 31 retractions sits at No. 25 on our leaderboard – brings the total to 13. 

Continue reading Nobel prize-winner tallies two more retractions, bringing total to 13

Penn State prof earns second retraction, faces third following university probe

Deborah Kelly

A professor of biomedical engineering at the Pennsylvania State University today lost a government-funded study in Science Advances, marking her second retraction. 

The researcher, Deborah Kelly, is also facing retraction of a paper in Current Opinion in Structural Biology after a review undertaken by her institution found “serious data integrity concerns” in the work, according to emails obtained by Retraction Watch. Kelly has hired a lawyer to fight the retraction, apparently without success. (Update on Sept. 12: The paper has now been retracted.)

Today’s retraction of “Structural analysis of BRCA1 reveals modification hotspot” cites “unresolved concerns in the integrity of the data presented,” including what appears to be alterations of cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps using an “eraser tool.” The study was funded in part through a National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant for US$353,386 to Kelly.

In a statement to Retraction Watch sent via her legal counsel, Kelly stood by her work. 

Continue reading Penn State prof earns second retraction, faces third following university probe

Pakistan university’s pharmacy department chair notches two retractions

Kashif Barkat

Kashif Barkat, who heads the Department of Pharmacy at the University of Lahore in Punjab, Pakistan, has had two of his studies retracted and two more corrected, all for issues related to images in the papers. Several more of his studies are flagged on PubPeer for similar reasons. 

According to the retraction notice for one of the retracted articles, which appeared in  Polymer Bulletin in 2020, Barkat does not agree with the journal’s decision to pull the paper. 

The paper, “Understanding mechanical characteristics of pH-responsive PEG 4000-based polymeric network for colorectal carcinoma: its acute oral toxicity study,” has been cited three times so far, according to Clarivate’s Web of Science. 

The retraction note, issued in June, reads: 

Continue reading Pakistan university’s pharmacy department chair notches two retractions

Swiss medical association accused of forcing publishing subsidiary into insolvency

A Swiss medical publisher has ceased operations, including shuttering nationally prominent journals, after its parent organization, the Swiss Medical Association FMH, allegedly forced it into bankruptcy.

According to information on the website of EMH Swiss Medical Publishers, the Swiss Medical Association FMH holds a 55% stake in the firm. But on Aug. 22, 2024, the FMH’s board terminated its collaboration with the publishing house, including licensing for the association’s journal Schweizerische Ärztezeitung (Swiss Medical Journal), with immediate effect. 

“In doing so, [the association] deprived its own company of its livelihood. EMH filed its balance sheet today and thus opened bankruptcy proceedings,” the publisher said in a notice posted on its website on September 4, 2024.

Continue reading Swiss medical association accused of forcing publishing subsidiary into insolvency