
Dear RW readers, can you spare $25?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- A second article describing new pain syndrome under scrutiny
- Kidney researcher debarred from federal U.S. funding for image manipulation
- Why do nearly 45,000 scholarly papers cite themselves?
- Cureus paper by dean and medical student retracted for mislabeled ECG
- Dental researchers fabricated data in two articles, university investigation found
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 500. There are more than 57,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 300 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List — or our list of nearly 100 papers with evidence they were written by ChatGPT?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Inside mass resignations; Ukraine’s “stolen institutions”; federal U.S. cuts hit journal subscriptions