
Dear RW readers, can you spare $25?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- Duke scientists lose eight papers for alleged image manipulation
- Sleuth unearths citation, authorship issues at earth sciences journal
- Former student who ran paper mill up to 11 retractions
- Journal issues speedy retraction in less than a day for ‘inadvertent mistake’
- Wiley retracts study stolen by reviewer, following Retraction Watch coverage
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 500. There are more than 60,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 300 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Science publishing a ‘hot mess’; AI microscopy ‘indistinguishable’ from real; social media as a bellwether for retractions