
Dear RW readers, can you spare $25?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- Chinese funding agency sanctions 26 researchers in latest misconduct report
- Biochemist with previous image duplication retractions loses another paper
- A new journal record: Sage title retracts 678 more papers, tally over 1,500
- Medical societies call for BMJ to retract ‘misleading and irresponsible’ guideline
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 500. There are more than 58,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 300 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List — or our list of nearly 100 papers with evidence they were written by ChatGPT?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Journals get letters from feds; invasion of the ‘journal snatchers’; should universities release misconduct reports?