Happy 14th birthday, Retraction Watch – and what a year it was

In our old diner haunt (now closed), more than a decade ago

We know we say this every year, but the last 12 months have been big ones for Retraction Watch as we celebrate our 14th birthday on August 3. We’ve continued breaking big stories and maintaining The Retraction Watch Database – while also taking big steps toward financial sustainability.

In September, we announced that the Database – which as of today contains more than 50,000 retractions – became completely open with its acquisition by Crossref. The move also allowed us to hire Gordon Sullivan, another staff member who works on the Database, and covers the costs of maintaining the Database 100% for at least five years.

We hope regular readers by now have noticed the site runs faster, with no downtime. That’s thanks to the volunteer efforts of Michael Dayah and Karl Lehenbauer, who over the past year or so have pitched in to help us with back-end platform and software issues. We can’t thank them enough for their ongoing support.

Some other highlights: 

Our work continues to be cited regularly in the scholarly literature as well as the popular press.

Thank you.

We close these birthday posts the same way every year: We always need more help. So we’re asking that you please consider a U.S. tax-deductible donation to support our work. You can make a one-time contribution by PayPal or by Square, or a monthly tax-deductible donation by Paypal. Or if you prefer to send a check, please make it out to The Center For Scientific Integrity and mail it to 121 W. 36th St., Suite 209, New York, NY 10018. Should you be in a position to donate securities, please contact [email protected] for instructions.

Thank you in advance, and thank you for your ongoing support.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

5 thoughts on “Happy 14th birthday, Retraction Watch – and what a year it was”

  1. Thanks for all your efforts. Godspeed!

    Hope with your and sleuth’s efforts, we can have a well-funded international scientific police that catches scientific misconduct. Hope to see journals finally stop pretending and really care about misconduct. Hope to see much harsher measures to fight misconduct, especially data fabrication.
    Hope to see criminalization and much more harsh penalties for scientific misconduct especially in medical and health research.

  2. Thanks for your effort for contributing to build a world with better science.

    I believe when someday in the future Retraction Watch has no news to report, it will definitely mean our world is absolute the best one ever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.