Retraction Watch readers, please join us in welcoming the newest member of our staff, Alison Abritis.
To say that Abritis is a good fit for Retraction Watch would be a colossal understatement. Abritis started her PhD in public health at the University of South Florida several years ago, intending to focus on toxicology. But her advisor noticed that every time they met, she would describe problematic papers she was reading. So he suggested that she focus on scientific publishing in her research.
The result was a fascinating dissertation, “An Assessment of Retractions as a Measure of Scientific Misconduct and Impact on Public Health Risks.” She found that less than half of Office of Research Integrity (ORI) findings resulted in a published retraction or correction, and even fewer had the misconduct indicated as cause for the published notice. She questions — as we often have — whether retractions are a good indicator of the overall rate of research misconduct.
We were thrilled to be able to hire someone who had just successfully defended a dissertation on retractions as our first-ever researcher. Abritis will be working with us on various projects, from the database of retractions we’re building, to scholarly research, and a book on scientific fraud.
Abritis was hired thanks to the generosity of the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. You can follow her on Twitter here.
Abritis joins our other full-time staffers, Alison McCook and Shannon Palus. You can read more about them here.
Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, and sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post. Click here to review our Comments Policy.
Wow …. hand-in-glove fit!! Congratulations to the growing RW family! Looking forward to Alison’s contributions.
Congrats Alison! I remember your name from my days at USF and at SESOT (toxicology).
Wow, a mighty Retraction Watch empire is coming into being!
Welcome on board, Alison! Looking forward to see your contributions.
Alison, best of luck to you. Central to the issue of correcting the literature is whistle-blowing, and the voice of the anonymous scientist. An interesting paper on the former here:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11948-014-9570-8
With a small critique here:
https://pubpeer.com/publications/3DF171660C658DA8DBD5036B275270#fb36829
A wonderful addition. Energy, enthusiasm and an investigative background. Looking forward to great work from her.
Welcome, Alison! And thanks for putting your dissertation online!