PubPeer Selections: Feedback within a day; “worst examples of data;” endocrinology papers questioned

PubPeer won a near-complete victory in a court case last week. Here’s another installment of PubPeer Selections:

• “Thanks for your comment, it’s great to get feedback so quickly on this,” writes the first author of an ecology paper published the day before.
• A thread is gathering “The worst examples of data in life science journals.”
• The editor-in-chief of Psychopharmacology has apparently responded to a commenter’s queries and said he’d follow COPE guidelines.
• “If you want to see the raw data of them, please ask me directly.” An author of a PLOS ONE paper apparently responds to questions about figures. [Note, 10 a.m. Eastern: This link is not working properly, PubPeer tells us they’re working on it.]
• The images in two Endocrinology papers and a FASEB Journal study by a team of researchers from Italy and Spain come under scrutiny.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider supporting our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, and sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post.