Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘RW announcements’ Category

Meet our new staff writer, Andrew P. Han

with 6 comments

Andrew P. Han

Please welcome Andrew P. Han, the newest addition to the Retraction Watch team.

Andy comes to Retraction Watch and the Center for Scientific Integrity from GenomeWeb, where he covered the explosion of CRISPR/Cas9 into the research and biotech scene over the last several years. He has also freelanced for, Popular, Newsweek, and Food & Wine. 

Andy’s beat at Retraction Watch will of course be retractions, but he’ll also be helping us broaden our coverage of the intersection between scientific misconduct at the law — so if you have court documents or stories, send them along.

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alison McCook

May 9th, 2017 at 11:30 am

Posted in RW announcements

Announcing the DiRT Award, a new “doing the right thing” prize — and its first recipient

with 2 comments

It takes a lot of work to clean up the scientific literature, and some researchers and organizations deserve special recognition. That’s why we’ve established a “doing the right thing” category when we see praise-worthy progress in individual retractions, and have now gone a step further: We’ve created the DiRT Award, a new annual prize to recognize particularly note-worthy behavior.

As our co-founders announce today in STAT, the first recipient of the DiRT Award is the American Diabetes Association (ADA). Regular readers may suspect why — here’ a hint — but to learn more about the award, and why it’s going to the ADA, check out our co-founders’ STAT column out today. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alison McCook

May 5th, 2017 at 8:00 am

Thank you, Helmsley Charitable Trust: $325,000 grant renewal will help us build a sustainable future

with one comment

We’re very pleased to announce an 18-month grant renewal for $325,000 from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust to The Center For Scientific Integrity, our parent non-profit organization.

The generous funding from the Helmsley Charitable Trust will allow us to build on the work funded by our original Helmsley grant. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alison McCook

April 6th, 2017 at 11:00 am

Posted in RW announcements

“Publications of questionable scientific value:” A scientist models a potential prom date

with 6 comments

Barry Cottonfield

Eve Armstrong had an important question: How would things have turned out if she had summoned the nerve to ask a certain Barry Cottonfield to her high school’s junior prom in 1997? Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

April 1st, 2017 at 11:24 am

Posted in RW announcements

Meet the latest addition to our team, Victoria Stern

with one comment

Please join us in welcoming our newest staff writer, Victoria Stern, to the Retraction Watch team.

Vicky first worked with editor Alison McCook in 2009 at The Scientist. Since then, she has been freelancing for a number of outlets, including Medscape, Scientific American Mind (where she became a contributing editor), General Surgery News, MedPage Today, and Reuters Health.

Funding for Vicky’s position is primarily thanks to Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alison McCook

February 2nd, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in RW announcements

Happy birthday, RW Daily. Have you signed up yet?

without comments

A year ago tomorrow, we announced that we were starting The RW Daily, an email that would summarize the previous day’s news and link to other relevant stories elsewhere — a sort of sneak peek at Weekend Reads.

In about six and a half years, we’ve published more than 3,600 posts; that’s a lot of science publishing news. For people who feel overloaded by individual email alerts every time a new post appears, a daily digest is a good option. Here’s today’s, if you want to take a look. If you haven’t already, click here to subscribe. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Alison McCook

January 24th, 2017 at 1:20 pm

Posted in RW announcements

The Retraction Watch 2016 year in review — and a sneak peek at our database

with 5 comments

It’s been another exciting year for us at Retraction Watch. As always, there has been more to cover than we have time for. At the same time, we’ve expanded our efforts in other media, telling bigger stories and offering more analysis. And we’ve made major progress on our database — more on that in a moment.

A sampling of what happened this year: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

December 30th, 2016 at 11:30 am

Posted in RW announcements

We removed a post temporarily. It’s back. Here’s why.

with 3 comments

On December 15, we removed a post from view as a result of a law that some have misused to have content removed from the web. Today, we have reinstated that post.

Here’s what the post about, if you’re curious: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

December 29th, 2016 at 12:14 pm

Posted in RW announcements

The top 10 retractions of 2016

with 6 comments

It’s that time again, when top-10 lists start appearing — and we’re no exception.

So check out our list of the 10 most noteworthy retractions of the year, posted by our friends at The Scientist.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here.

Written by Alison McCook

December 21st, 2016 at 9:30 am

Posted in RW announcements

We’ve temporarily removed a Retraction Watch post. Here’s why. (Hint: A bad law.)

with 4 comments

Longtime Retraction Watch readers may recall that in 2013, we were forced to temporarily remove ten posts following a false — and frankly ridiculous — copyright infringement claim.

Well, it’s happened again.

On Wednesday, our host, Bluehost, forwarded us another false copyright claim — aka a Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notice — by someone calling himself “Jiya Khan” and claiming to be based in Delhi, India. (Well, specifically, in “Rohini,sector-12,” which would mean that he or she is based at one of  two petrol stations.)

Khan insisted under penalty of perjury that a December 2014 post of ours — which we have now temporarily removed from public view (more on that in a moment) — violated his or her copyright.

What actually happened, in an eerie echo of the 2013 case, is that Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

December 16th, 2016 at 11:30 am