Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Weekend reads: Sexual harassment = scientific misconduct, says one society; favorite plagiarism excuses

with one comment

The week at Retraction Watch featured an expression of concern in Science just days after a paper was published, mass editorial board resignations over a paper defending colonialism, and two papers retracted for publisher errors. Here’s what was happening elsewhere:

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here.

Written by Ivan Oransky

September 23rd, 2017 at 9:00 am

Posted in weekend reads

Comments
  • herr doktor bimler September 23, 2017 at 3:46 pm

    This is an odd press release retraction notice.

    Link only leads to “403” for me. Is that the oddness? Or was there an earlier retraction notice that has now been retracted?

  • Post a comment

    Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.