About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Retraction six appears for Jesús Angel Lemus

with 3 comments

royal lettersJesús A. Lemus, he of the likely ghost author and questionable data, has earned his sixth retraction, this one in Biology Letters.

Here’s the notice for “Stress associated with group living in a long-lived bird:”

After careful examination, there is a need to question the validity of the results conducted by Jesús A. Lemus in the above paper, published in Biology Letters. Although the field and statistical procedures are correct, we have not been able to clarify in which external laboratories Dr Lemus conducted the hormonal and parasite analysis. Given the ephemeral nature of the material used (faeces), we are unable to repeat the analysis with the same samples employed in the original study. Therefore, we wish to retract the article. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience to the readers of Biology Letters.

Like the August 2012 Expression of Concern about the same paper, the notice is signed by all seven of the paper’s authors except Lemus. The original paper has been cited three times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge.

Hat tip: Kevin Keenan, Tom Langen

About these ads

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Sounds like he just made up the parasite and hormonal data and pocketed the money he was paid to send the feces to external labs for analysis. N’cest pas? Perhaps a statistical analysis of that “data” would reveal some anomalies.

    puzzled monkey

    January 21, 2013 at 4:46 pm

  2. Poor Jesus Angel, I never knew the world of ornithological microflora was so cut-throat.

    It is a shame that Adam Marcus wasn’t writing this one – I guess he would have avoided “Jesus can’t keep his shit together” as both too vulgar and possibly blasphemous. But I think he might have run with “Retraction #6 falls between two stools.”


    January 21, 2013 at 7:46 pm

  3. Oh, Jesus!

    The Father

    January 24, 2013 at 12:21 am

We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35,847 other followers

%d bloggers like this: