Top 10 most highly cited retracted papers

Ever curious which retracted papers have been most cited by other scientists? Below, we present the list of the 10 most highly cited retractions as of November 12, 2025. Readers will see some familiar entries, such as the infamous Lancet paper by Andrew Wakefield that originally suggested a link between autism and childhood vaccines. You’ll note that some papers — including the #8 most cited paper — received more citations after they were retracted, which research has shown is an ongoing problem.

Article Year of retraction Citing Articles before retraction Citing Articles   after retraction Total cites (journals indexed by Web of Science)
1. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult. Nature. June 20, 2002. Y Jiang, BN Jahagirdar, RL Reinhardt, RE Schwartz, CD Keene, XR Ortiz-Gonzalez, M Reyes, T Lenvik, T Lund, M Blackstad, J Du, S Aldrich, A Lisberg, WC Low, DA Largaespada, CM Verfaillie  2024 4491 29 4520
2. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. March 20, 2020. P Gautret, JC Lagier, P Parola, VT Hoang, L Meddeb, M Mailhe, B Doudier, J Courjon, V Giordanengo, VE Vieira, HT Dupont, S Honoré, P Colson, E Chabrière, B La Scola , JM Rolain, P Brouqui, D Raoult 2024 3171 27 3198
3. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. January 8, 2021. C Huang, L Huang, Y Wang, X Li, L Ren, X Gu, L Kang, L Guo, M Liu, X Zhou, J Luo, Z Huang, S Tu, Y Zhao, L Chen, D Xu, Y Li, C Li, L Peng, Y Li, W Xie, D Cui, L Shang, G Fan, J Xu, G Wang, Y Wang, J Zhong, C Wang, J Wang, D Zhang, B Cao  2023 2007 759 2766
4. Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with a Mediterranean Diet. New England Journal of Medicine.  April 4, 2013. R Estruch, E Ros, J Salas-Salvadó, M-I Covas, D Corella, F Arós, E Gómez-Gracia, V Ruiz-Gutiérrez, M Fiol, J Lapetra, RM Lamuela-Raventos, L Serra-Majem, X Pintó, J Basora, MA Muñoz, JV Sorlí, JA Martínez, MA Martínez-González,  for the PREDIMED Study Investigators 2018 1756 929 2685
5. A specific amyloid-β protein assembly in the brain impairs memory. Nature. March 16, 2008. S Lesné, MT Koh, L Kotilinek, R Kayed, CG Glabe, A Yang, M Gallagher, KH Ashe 2024 2359 31 2390
6. Predictive Validity of a Medication Adherence Measure in an Outpatient Setting. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. May 2, 2008. DE Morisky, A Ang, M Krousel-Wood, HJ Ward 2023 1931 271 2202
7. MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. June 25, 2008. DD Taylor, C Gercel-Taylor  2023 1868 79 1947
8. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. Lancet. February 28, 1998. AJ Wakefield, SH Murch, A Anthony, J Linnell, DM Casson, M Malik, M Berelowitz, AP Dhillon, MA Thomson, P Harvey, A Valentine, SE Davies, JA Walker-Smith. 2010 644 1115 1759
9. Recent progress in processing and properties of ZnO. Progress in Materials Science. May 28, 2004. SJ Pearton, DP Norton, K Ip, YW Heo, T Steiner  2020 1550 89 1639
10. Visfatin: A protein secreted by visceral fat that mimics the effects of insulin. Science. January 21, 2005. A Fukuhara, M Matsuda, M Nishizawa, K Segawa, M Tanaka, K Kishimoto, Y Matsuki, M Murakami, T Ichisaka, H Murakami, E Watanabe, T Takagi, M Akiyoshi, T Ohtsubo, S Kihara, S Yamashita, M Makishima, T Funahashi, S Yamanaka, R Hiramatsu, Y Matsuzawa, I Shimomura 2007 232 1340 1572

Note: To obtain the number of citations before and after a retraction was issued, we relied  on the “Citation index” portion of  Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science (WoS), which only adds up the number of citations from journals indexed by the WoS Core Collection. Therefore, the  citation count using just those two values can be lower than the total citation count for each article listed by WoS. Those eagle-eyed readers may notice that the column headings have been changed slightly; this was to better reflect the criteria causing the discrepancy in total counts.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.