Weekend reads: How to prove (and find) false claims; confessions of a wasteful scientist

booksThis week at Retraction Watch featured what may be a record for plagiarism, a paper retracted because the device researchers claimed to use hadn’t arrive in the institution yet, and a technical glitch, which meant you may have missed some of our posts. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: How to prove (and find) false claims; confessions of a wasteful scientist

Weekend reads: Improper influence by NFL; dissertations for sale; how common is failure to reproduce?

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured controversy over an economics paper, and a report of a researcher who faked more than 70 experiments. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Improper influence by NFL; dissertations for sale; how common is failure to reproduce?

Weekend reads: Grim outlook for PhDs; “stealth research;” more sexual harassment

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured a discussion of why science has bigger problems than retractions, and a look at what happened when a journal decided to get tough on plagiarism. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Grim outlook for PhDs; “stealth research;” more sexual harassment

Weekend reads: A peer reviewer goes on strike; why science should be more boring; publish or perish = less quality

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured an economist being asked to review his own paper, and a new member of our leaderboard. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: A peer reviewer goes on strike; why science should be more boring; publish or perish = less quality

Weekend reads: Another autism-vaccine fraud movie?; zombie papers; herbicide-cancer report taken down

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured an imposter editor and an author who threatened to sue a journal if it didn’t reverse a retraction. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Another autism-vaccine fraud movie?; zombie papers; herbicide-cancer report taken down

Weekend reads: Research parasite awards; money-back research guarantees; Sci-Hub takes over the world

booksThis week at Retraction Watch featured a confession about research misconduct, and a debate over whether a paper should have been retracted. Here’s what was happening elsewhere:  Continue reading Weekend reads: Research parasite awards; money-back research guarantees; Sci-Hub takes over the world

Weekend reads: Peer review, troubled from the start; how to survive as a whistle-blower

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured news that one in 25 papers in a massive screen includes inappropriate image manipulation, and of the eighth and ninth retractions for a neuroscience team. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Peer review, troubled from the start; how to survive as a whistle-blower

Weekend reads: PubPeer = vigilantes?; why journals cost what they do; who publishes most

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured a retraction from Nature, and a discussion of what it means to be an author on a paper with thousands of them. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: PubPeer = vigilantes?; why journals cost what they do; who publishes most

Weekend reads: Disney retraction request; NEJM under fire; how to fight unfavorable reviews

booksThe week at Retraction Watch featured the retraction of a hoax article from a philosophy journal and an image in a paper that looked familiar because it was from a catalog. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Disney retraction request; NEJM under fire; how to fight unfavorable reviews

Weekend reads: Calls for retraction a bad idea?; is scientific fraud a crime?

booksThis week at Retraction Watch featured an unusual excuse for missing data, and a guilty plea in court for misconduct. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Calls for retraction a bad idea?; is scientific fraud a crime?