The week at Retraction Watch featured the heartfelt response of a researcher when she found out a paper she’d reviewed had been retracted, and a new member of our leaderboard. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Pseudoscience in the literature; a world without journals; “invisible and abandoned” trials
Category: weekend reads
Weekend reads: Fake news in science; how not to stress about science; another hilarious sting
The final week of 2016 at Retraction Watch featured the retraction of a high-profile paper on diabetes from Harvard, and the retraction of a JAMA article on whether zinc was useful for the common cold. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Fake news in science; how not to stress about science; another hilarious sting
Weekend reads: The year’s top retractions; quoting Trump leads to a firing; life without Elsevier journals
This week at Retraction Watch featured revelations about a frequent co-author of the world’s retraction record holder, and a prison term for fraud. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: The year’s top retractions; quoting Trump leads to a firing; life without Elsevier journals
Weekend reads: One of the most highly cited papers ever; a pharma buys peer-reviewed praise; how to get more citations
The week at Retraction Watch featured revelations about a cancer researcher in Canada and an author’s worst nightmare come true. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: One of the most highly cited papers ever; a pharma buys peer-reviewed praise; how to get more citations
Weekend reads: A flawed paper makes it into Nature; is science in big trouble?; a reproducibility crisis history
The week at Retraction Watch featured a refreshingly honest retraction, and a big win for PubPeer. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: A flawed paper makes it into Nature; is science in big trouble?; a reproducibility crisis history
Weekend reads: Paying peer reviewers; the embargo debate; crushed by data
This week at Retraction Watch featured some big numbers: How a request to correct a single paper turned into 19 retractions, and 18 tips for giving horrible presentations. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Paying peer reviewers; the embargo debate; crushed by data
Weekend reads: Fake scientists; fake research; major evils of modern research
The week at Retraction Watch featured the story of a graduate student who fought back after being caught in the middle of a fraud case, and the retraction of a hotly debated paper from Nature Cell Biology. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Fake scientists; fake research; major evils of modern research
Weekend reads: Is the peer review system sustainable?; when to submit papers; fraud as an outbreak
The week at Retraction Watch featured news of a publisher hack, and a story about a Nature Cell Biology paper likely headed for retraction. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Is the peer review system sustainable?; when to submit papers; fraud as an outbreak
Weekend reads: Jail for scientific fraud?; data-sharing horrors; the lighter side of retractions
The week at Retraction Watch featured the retraction of a physics society’s press release quoting U.S. president-elect Donald Trump, and an apparent blow for clairvoyance research. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Jail for scientific fraud?; data-sharing horrors; the lighter side of retractions
Weekend reads: Frustrated scientists; most brutal rejection ever?; public shaming in science
The week at Retraction Watch featured 58 retractions in one fell swoop, and a look at what you should do if you find out a paper you’ve cited has been retracted. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Continue reading Weekend reads: Frustrated scientists; most brutal rejection ever?; public shaming in science