Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- Two papers retracted for plagiarizing a 50-year-old thesis
- Editor and authors refuse to share data of paper containing alleged statistical errors
- How a widely used ranking system ended up with three fake journals in its top 10 philosophy list
- Brain tumor researchers lose second paper as UCSF investigates
- ‘Perplexed’ author’s identity forged on plagiarized paper in ‘probably fake’ journal
- Expression of concern coming for paper some used to link COVID-19 vaccines to deaths
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 400. There are more than 49,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 250 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List — or our list of nearly 100 papers with evidence they were written by ChatGPT?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: ‘An epidemic of scientific fakery’; death threats for critics; Cleveland Clinic settles mismanagement allegations for $7.6 million