Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work?
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- Paper recommending vitamin D for COVID-19 retracted four years after expression of concern
- What a database of more than a thousand dismissive literature reviews can tell us
- Journal retracts redundant case study of same patient from different authors
- ‘All authors agree’ to retraction of Nature article linking microbial DNA to cancer
- Seventeen journals lose impact factors for suspected citation manipulation
- Authors – including a dean and a sleuth – correcting paper with duplicated image
- Finland group downgrades 60 journals
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up past 400. There are more than 49,000 retractions in The Retraction Watch Database — which is now part of Crossref. The Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker now contains more than 250 titles. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers? What about The Retraction Watch Mass Resignations List — or our list of nearly 100 papers with evidence they were written by ChatGPT?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Huge cash bonuses for publishing in Nature; Alzheimer’s researcher charged with fraud; fines for buying authorship