data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad56c/ad56ce441676a7c72187027014932cb12cf09a2d" alt=""
Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work? Thanks in advance.
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- COVID-19-vitamin D paper retracted by Springer Nature journal
- Study on reducing parents’ anxiety about children’s circumcision retracted
- More than 300 at once: Publisher retracts entire conference proceedings
- What we’ve learned from public records requests. Please help us file more.
- Authors blame ‘unintentional oversight’ for including image of deceased patient in paper
- 8 years after three papers are flagged — and after losing original correspondence — PLOS ONE retracts
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up to 221. There are more than 33,000 retractions in our database — which powers retraction alerts in EndNote, LibKey, Papers, and Zotero. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Should ‘peer reviewers be paid?’; Kim Kardashian and conflicts of interest; scandal costs millions in grants