Would you consider a donation to support Weekend Reads, and our daily work? Thanks in advance.
The week at Retraction Watch featured:
- UCLA veteran researcher faked data in 11 grant applications, per Feds
- More than a year ago, an editor agreed a paper should be retracted. It hasn’t been.
- Doctor faces apparent retaliation after alleging data manipulation in published trial
- Leading primate researcher admits to faking data in NIH grant applications, paper
- Happy 12th birthday, Retraction Watch: And what a year it was
- Exclusive: PLOS ONE to retract more than 100 papers for manipulated peer review
- 14 retractions for researchers who falsely claimed US physicist as co-author
- ‘One would not want to tarnish another journal’: Why a republished COVID-19 masks study doesn’t say it was retracted
Our list of retracted or withdrawn COVID-19 papers is up to 253. There are more than 35,000 retractions in our database — which powers retraction alerts in EndNote, LibKey, Papers, and Zotero. And have you seen our leaderboard of authors with the most retractions lately — or our list of top 10 most highly cited retracted papers?
Here’s what was happening elsewhere (some of these items may be paywalled, metered access, or require free registration to read):
Continue reading Weekend reads: Are papers retracted often enough?; ‘What makes an undercover science sleuth tick?’; journals dominate prestige rankings