About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘nature retractions’ Category

Nature corrects a correction

with 13 comments

nature 4 9 14Last year, we reported on a Nature correction of a paper for what a McGill University committee had earlier called “intentionally contrived and falsified” figures. It turns out that the correction — like the original paper — left some Nature readers puzzled, so the journal has run a correction of the correction: Read the rest of this entry »

About these ads

Written by ivanoransky

April 14, 2014 at 9:30 am

RIKEN finds two “instances of research misconduct” in STAP stem cell work

with 9 comments

rikenJapan’s RIKEN research center has found misconduct in work that led to two controversial Nature papers, purporting to show an easy way to create stem cells, that have been dogged by criticism for months.

Here’s an excerpt from today’s statement about “six items [RIKEN] has been investigating:”

Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

April 1, 2014 at 10:31 am

“I am deeply saddened and disturbed:” Co-author of retracted Nature paper reveals how problems came to light

with 40 comments

Ben Scheres

Ben Scheres

On Wednesday, we reported on a Nature retraction of a paper whose corresponding author had also had a Cell paper retracted, and had been found to have committed a “violation of academic integrity” by Utrecht University. Today, we present the back story of how those retractions came to be, from another co-author of both papers, Ben Scheres, of Wageningen University: Read the rest of this entry »

Nature paper by researcher found to have violated academic integrity retracted

with 4 comments

dhonukshe

Pankaj Dhonukshe

A 2013 paper in Nature that was among those whose first or last author had committed a “violation of academic integrity,” according to Utrecht University, has been retracted.

Here’s the notice: for “CLASP-mediated cortical microtubule organization guides PIN polarization axis,” whose corresponding author was Pankaj Dhonukshe: Read the rest of this entry »

Co-author of controversial acid STAP stem cell papers in Nature requests retraction: report

with 17 comments

nature 2-27-14A co-author of two papers claiming to have shown how to create stem cells simply and easily has requested their retraction, the Wall Street Journal is reporting: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

March 10, 2014 at 10:06 am

Nature paper retracted following multiple failures to reproduce results

with 7 comments

nature 2-27-14An international team of researchers from the NIH, Harvard, the University of Michigan, and two Chinese universities — Fourth Military Medical University and China Medical University — has retracted their 2012 paper in Nature after they — and a number of other groups — were unable to reproduce the key results.

The original abstract for “The NAD-dependent deacetylase SIRT2 is required for programmed necrosis” said that the findings

implicate SIRT2 as an important regulator of programmed necrosis and indicate that inhibitors of this deacetylase may constitute a novel approach to protect against necrotic injuries, including ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction.

But here’s the notice, by corresponding author Toren Finkel and colleagues: Read the rest of this entry »

Utrecht University finds “violation of academic integrity” by former researcher

with 24 comments

dhonukshe

Pankaj Dhonukshe

We have an update on the case of Pankaj Dhonukshe, a scientist about whom we reported in November. Utrecht University has found that Dhonukshe, a former researcher at the Dutch university, committed “a violation of academic integrity” in work that led to a number of papers, including one published in Nature and once since retracted from Cell.

Here’s the university’s statement: Read the rest of this entry »

Nature apologizes for publishing letter dismissing need for gender balance

with 16 comments

courtesy Nature Publishing Group

courtesy Nature Publishing Group

In yesterday’s Weekend Reads, we highlighted a piece by Hope Jahren explaining why she wouldn’t agree to a Q&A with Nature. We found out after Weekend Reads had posted that the story had moved on, so here’s an update.

Jahren was objecting — as did a number of people — to a letter published in Nature earlier in the week by Lukas Koube of Sherman, Texas, which began: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

January 19, 2014 at 9:30 am

Shigeaki Kato notches five more retractions, including one in Nature

with 4 comments

katoShikeagi Kato, an endocrinology researcher who resigned from the University of Tokyo in March 2012 amid an investigation that concluded 43 of his papers should be retracted, has retracted five more papers.

The newest is in this week’s Nature, for “GlcNAcylation of a histone methyltransferase in retinoic-acid-induced granulopoiesis,” a paper first published in 2009. Here’s the notice: Read the rest of this entry »

At long last, disputed dance study retracted from Nature

with 9 comments

trivers natureA 2005 Nature study that has vexed one of its authors since 2007 is finally being retracted.

The notice for “Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men,” by William M. Brown, Lee Cronk, Keith Grochow, Amy Jacobson, C. Karen Liu, Zoran Popovic´& Robert Trivers, says very little: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

November 27, 2013 at 1:00 pm

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,154 other followers