Papers that cite Retraction Watch

Over the years, many papers have cited the work of Retraction Watch, whether a blog post, an article we’ve written for another outlet, or our database. Here’s a selection. Know of one we’ve missed? Let us know at [email protected].

  1. aan de Brugh M. 2020. Magentische stenen en ander coronawangedrag. NRC. 31 December. (News Article)
  2. Abalkina A. 2021. Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive. Scientometrics. 126, 7123–7148. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0 (Journal Article – Research)
  3. Abalkina A. 2021. Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from Russia. (Preprint) arXiv. 2112.13322.
  4. Abalkina A. 2023. Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 75(4):395-422. doi: 10.1002/asi.24855 (Journal Article – Research)
  5. Abbas M, Pires D, Peters A, Morel CM, Hurst S, et al. Conflicts of interest in infection prevention and control research: no smoke without fire. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(10):1679-1690. doi:10.1007/s00134-018-5361-z (Journal Article – Research)
  6. Abbasi K. 2022. Russia’s war: Why the BMJ opposes an academic boycott. BMJ. 376.
  7. Abdin AY. 2023. Critical Evaluation of Pharmacy: Truth, Control and Application. Universität des Saarlandes. doi:10.22028/D291-42145 (Dissertation.)
  8. Academia Magazine (n.d.). International bodies find KFUEIT VC guilty of plagiarism. Academia. (News Article)
  9. Aguado-López E, Becerril-García A. 2021. The duration of peer review: An obstacle to scientific communication? Interciencia. 46(2), 56-64. (Journal Article – Research)
  10. Akst J. 2022. PLOS One pulls five papers tied to Alzheimer’s drug controversy. The Scientist. 31 March. (News Article)
  11. Akhtar MK. 2024. The H-index is an unreliable research metric for evaluating the publication impact of experimental scientists. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 9:1385080. doi:10.3389/frma.2024.1385080
  12. Alexander RW, Yang S, Peterson CJ, Nugent K. 2024. Analysis of the Types of Retracted COVID-19 Articles Published in PubMed-Listed Journals. The Soutnern Medical Journal. 117(7):358-363. doi:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001708 (Journal Article – Research)
  13. Alfirevic Z. 2020. Retracted papers are only the tip of the iceberg of untrustworthy evidence. AJOG MFM. 2(4):100223. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100223
  14. Alfirevic Z, Weeks J. 2024. Trustworthiness assessment of published clinical trials: Literature review of domains and questions. Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods. 2(8):e12099. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12099. (Journal Article – Review)
  15. Almroth BC, Jutflet F, Bour A. 2020. Accurate science requires that we base our work on accurate publications. Environmental Pollution. 261. (Journal Article – Letter to the Editor)
  16. Anderson C, Nugent K, Peterson C. 2021. Academic journal retractions and the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 12. (Journal Article – Research)
  17. Ansede M. 2024. El aspirante a rector que escribió cuatro párrafos y se citó a sí mismo 100 veces. El Pais. Published March 15, 2024. (News Article)
  18. Ansede M. 2024. El odontólogo José Luis Calvo Guirado entra en el top 20 mundial de científicos con más estudios retirados. El Pais. Published March 6, 2024. (News Article)
  19. Ansede M. 2024. El aspirante a rector que escribió cuatro párrafos y se citó a sí mismo 100 veces. El Pais. Published March 15, 2024. (News Article)
  20. Armond ACV, Gordign B, Lewis J, Hosseini M, Bodnár JK, et al. 2021. A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases. BMC Medical Ethics. 22. (Journal Article – Review)
  21. Arthur PL, Hearn L. 2021. Toward open research: A narrative review of the challenges and opportunities for open humanities. Journal of Communication. 71(5), 827-853. (Journal Article – Review/Editorial)
  22. Audisio K, Robinson NB, Soletti GJ, Cancelli G, Dimagli A,…Gaudino M. 2021. A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature. International Journal of Cardiology. 349, 109-114. (Journal Article)
  23. Avenell A, Bolland MJ, Gamble GD, Grey A. 2022. A randomized trial alerting authors, with or without coauthors or editors, that research they cited in systematic reviews and guidelines has been retracted. Accountability in Research. 31(1):14-37. doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2082290 (Journal Article – Research)
  24. Avissar-Whitting M, Bakker C, Heckner H, Massip S, Schneider J,…Woods N. 2021. Addressing disorder in scholarly communication: Strategies from NISO Plus 2021. Information Services & Use. 41(1-2), 107-121. (Journal Article)
  25. Bakker CJ, Reardon EE, Brwon SJ, Theis-Mahon N, Schroter S, Bouter L, Zeegers MP. 2024. Identification of Retracted Publications and Completeness of Retraction Notices in Public Health. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111427 (Journal Article – Research)
  26. Balachandran Nair L, Ascani A. 2022. Addressing low-profile misconduct in management academia through theoretical triangulation and transformative ethics education. International Journal of Management Education. 20(3):100728. doi: 1016/j.ijme.2022.100728 (Journal Article – Research)
  27. Baldridge AS, Bellinger GC, Fleming OM, Rasmussen LV, Whitley EW, Welty LJ. 2024. The epidemiology of errors in data capture, management, and analysis: A scoping review of retracted articles and retraction notices in clinical and translational research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 8(1):e110. doi:10.1017/cts.2024.533 (Journal Article – Research)
  28. Banerjee A. Jargon and metrics for evaluation: Are they valid or instead promote questionable practices? Medical Journal of Dr DY Patil Vidyapeeth. 2020;13(4):295. doi:10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_33_20
  29. Banerjee T, Partin K, Resnik DB. 2022. Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted. Science and Engineering Ethics. 28:31. doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00386-1 (Journal Article – Research)
  30. Bar AC. Medical reversals and retractions in clinical evaluations. Journal of Medical Device Regulation. 2020;17(2). Accessed September 23, 2020. https://globalregulatorypress.com/product/medical-reversals-and-retractions-in-clinical-evaluations-may-2020/
  31. Barnett A. 2024. Checking BibTeX files against the Retraction Watch database. Median Watch (blog). posted 3/12/2024. Retrieved from https://medianwatch.netlify.app/post/retraction_watch/
  32. Basumatary B, Verma MK. 2024. Unearthing the misconduct and inaccuracies in social science research: a trend analysis of retracted articles based on retraction watch database. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1108/GKMC-04-2024-0228 (Journal Article – Research)
  33. Bendiscioli S, Garfinkel MS. Governance of Research Integrity: Options for a Coordinated Approach in Europe. EMBO; 2020. https://www.embo.org/documents/science_policy/governance_of_ri.pdf
  34. Bennett C, Chambers LM, Al-Hafez L, et al. Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. Published online August 19, 2020:100201. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100201
  35. Bhatt B. 2021. A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences. Scientometrics. 126:4039-4054. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03907-0 (Journal Article – Research)
  36. Bhattacharya K, Bhattacharya N. 2023. “Wall of Shame”—a Medical Journal’s Highest Code of Conduct? Indian Journal of Surgery. 85:1513. doi: 10.1007/s12262-023-03726-y (Journal Article – Letter/Commentary)
  37. Biju VV, Jose S, Franklin J, Jasimudeen S. 2025. An analysis of availability and implications of unlabeled retracted articles on Sci-Hub. Accountability in Research. 1–20. doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2446558
  38. Bolland MJ, Avenell A, Grey A. 2024. Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better? Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Published online March 13, 2024. doi:10.1080/03036758.2024.2325004 (Journal Article – Review)
  39. Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. 2021. Citation of retracted publications: A challenging problem. Accountability in Research. Online First. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1886933
  40. Borczyk B. 2024. Who Would Care about the Science? Critique of the Paper by Gündemir et al. (2023), with Comments on Peer Review Responsibility. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica. 76(4): 587-590.
  41. Bouter L. 2024. Fake academic papers are on the rise: why they’re a danger and how to stop them. The Conversation. Published March 6, 2024. (Ezine Article)
  42. Bouter L. 2024. Tackling research misconduct. BMJ. 386:q1595. doi:10.1136/bmj.q1595 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  43. Brundy C, Thornton JB. 2024. The paper mill crisis is a five-alarm fire for science: what can librarians do about it? UKSG Insights. 37:11. doi: 10.1629/uksg.659 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  44. Cabanac G. 2024. Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature. Nature, 632(8027): 977-979. doi:10.1038/d41586-024-02747-1 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  45. Call CM, Michalakes PC, Lachance AD, Zink T, McGrory BJ. 2024. A Systematic Review of Retracted Publications in Clinical Orthopaedic Research. The Journal of Arthroplasty. In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.085
  46. Candal-Pedreira C, Ruana-Ravina A, Pérez-Río M. 2021. Should the European Union have an office of research integrity? European Journal of Internal Medicine. 94:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2021.07.009
  47. Candal-Pedreira C, Ross JS, Rey-Brandariz J, Ruana-Ravina A. Revocación de publicaciones en España: un análisis retrospectivo utilizando la base de datos Retraction Watch [Retraction of publications in Spain: A retrospective analysis using the Retraction Watch database]. Medicina Clínica. 163(12):626-633. doi:10.1016/j.medcli.2024.07.003 (Journal Article – Research)
  48. Capodici A, Salussolia A, Sanmarchi F, Gori D, Golinelli D. 2022. Biased, wrong and counterfeited evidences published during the COVID-19 pandemic, a systematic review of retracted COVID-19 papers. Quality & Quantity. 57:4881-4913. doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01587-3 (Journal Article – Review)
  49. Cardenuto JP, Rocha A. 2022. Benchmarking Scientific Image Forgery Detectors. Science and Engineering Ethics. 28:35. doi:10.1007/s11948-022-00391-4 (Journal Article – Research)
  50. Cardenuto JP, Mandelli S, Moreira D, Bestagini P, Delp E, Rocha A. 2024. Explainable Artifacts for Synthetic Western Blot Source Attribution. arXiv. October 3, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.18881 (Preprint – Research)
  51. Carlisle JB. False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(4):472-479. doi:10.1111/anae.15263
  52. Carney Almroth B, Jutfelt F, Bour A. Accurate science requires that we base our work on accurate publications. Environmental Pollution. 2020;261:114238. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114238
  53. Caron MM, Lye CT, Bierer BE, Barnes M. 2024. The PubPeer conundrum: Administrative challenges in research misconduct proceedings. Accountability in Research. Published online on August 13, 2024. doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2390007 (Journal Artifcle – Review)
  54. Chakraborty J, Pradhan DK, Nandi S. On the identification and analysis of citation pattern irregularities among journals. Expert Systems. n/a(n/a):e12561. doi:10.1111/exsy.12561
  55. Chambers LM, Michener CM, Falcone T. Authors’ reply re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2019;126(10):1289-1290. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15828
  56. Chan MS, Jones C, Albarracín D. 2017. Countering False Beliefs: An Analysis of the Evidence and Recommendations of Best Practices for the Retraction and Correction of Scientific Misinformation. In Jamieson KH, Kahan DM, Scheufele DA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication. Oxford Publishing. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37
  57. Choudhry HS, Anur SM, Choudhry HS, Kokush EM, Patel AM, Fang CH. 2024. Retracted Publications in Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery: What Mistakes Are Being Made? OTO Open. 5(2):e157. doi: 10.1002/oto2.157 (Journal Article – Research)
  58. Clase CM, Dicks E, Holden R, Sood MM, Levin A, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Moore LW, Bartlett SJ, Bello AK, Bohm C, Bridgewater D, Bouchard J, Burger D, Carrero JJ, Donald M, Elliott M, Goldenberg MJ, Jardine M, Lam NN, Maddigan WJ, Madore F, Mavrakanas TA, Molnar AO, Ramash Prasad GV, Rigatto C, Tennankore KK, Torban E, Trainor L, White CA, Hartwig S. 2022. Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action. Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease. vol. 9. doi: 10.1177/20543581221080327 (Journal Article – Research)
  59. Coates H, Goben A, Briney K. 2023. What if It Didn’t Happen: Data Management and Avoiding Research Misconduct. Journal of eScience Librarianship. 12(3):e746. doi:10.7191/jeslib.746
  60. Cooke SJ, Young N, Peiman KS, Roche DG, Clements JC, Kadykalo AN, Provencher JF, Raghavan R, DeRosa MC, Lennox RJ, Fayek AR, Cristescu ME, Murray SJ, Quinn J, Cobey KD, Browman HI. 2024. A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections. FACETS. 9: 1-14. doi:10.1139/facets-2024-0102 (Journal Article – Perspective)
  61. Cortegiani A, Catalisano G, Ippolito M, Giarratano A, Absalom AR, Einav S. 2021. Retracted papers on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 126(4):e155-e156. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.008
  62. Coudert F-X. Correcting the Scientific Record: Retraction Practices in Chemistry and Materials Science. Chem Mater. 2019;31(10):3593-3598. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00897
  63. Cox A, Craig R, Tourish D. Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics. Research Policy. 2018;47(5):924-35. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016
  64. Crotty D. 2024. The Latest “Crisis” — Is the Research Literature Overrun with ChatGPT- and LLM-generated Articles? The Scholarly Kitchen. Published on March 20, 2024. (Blog Article)
  65. D’Souza DM, Sade RM, Moffatt-Bruce SD. The many facets of research integrity: What can we do to ensure it? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;160(3):730-733. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.127
  66. Dadkhah M, Oermann MH, Raman R, Dávid LD. 2023. A serious threat to publishing ethics and research integrity: Citations to hijacked journals. Equilibrium. 18(4):897-906. doi:10.24136/eq.2023.028. (Journal Article – Research)
  67. Dal-Ré R. Analysis of biomedical Spanish articles retracted between 1970 and 2018. Med Clin (Barc). 2020;154(4):125-130. doi:10.1016/j.medcle.2019.04.033
  68. Dal-Ré R, Bouter LM, Moher D, Marušić A. Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors. BMJ. 2020;370. doi:10.1136/bmj.m2872
  69. Dal‐Ré R. Analysis of retracted articles on medicines administered to humans. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;85(9):2179-2181. doi:10.1111/bcp.14021
  70. Damasio E. 2023. Brazilian retractions in the Retraction Watch Database – RWDB. The Crossref Community Forum. (Poster)
  71. De Almeida RMV. 2022. How did the scientific publication system respond to the Covid-19 pandemic?. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 2(3). doi:10.47909/ijsmc.160 (Journal Article: Commentary)
  72. De Cassai A, Volpe F, Geraldini F, Dost B, Boscolo A, Navalesi P. 2023. Citing retracted literature: a word of caution. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 17 January 2023. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104177 (Journal Article – Research)
  73. Decullier E, Maisonneuve H. Correcting the literature: Improvement trends seen in contents of retraction notices. BMC Research Notes. 2018;11(1):490. doi:10.1186/s13104-018-3576-2
  74. Dehdarirad T, Schirone M. 2023. Use of positive terms and certainty language in retracted and non-retracted articles: The case of biochemistry. Journal of Information Science. doi:10.1177/01655515231176650
  75. Di Traglia R, Dunne H, Tysome J, Smith ME. 2024. A systematic review of ENT retractions. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s00405-024-08980-8 Corrected: December 30, 2024. doi:10.1007/s00405-024-09119-5 (Journal Article – Research)
  76. Díaz GM. El fraude en las publicaciones científicas: más allá de fabricar, falsificar y plagiar. TecnoLógicas. 2061;19(36). Accessed September 23, 2020. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-77992016000100001
  77. Dinis-Oliveira RJ. COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science.” Accessed September 23, 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754
  78. Djekidel MN, Rosikiewicz W, Peng JC, Kanneganti TD, Hui Y, Jin H, Hedges D, Schreiner P, Fan Y, Wu G, Xu B. CovidExpress: an interactive portal for intuitive investigation on SARS-CoV-2 related transcriptomes. (Preprint) bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.05.14.444026
  79. Dougherty MV. Translation Plagiarism. In: Dougherty MV, ed. Disguised Academic Plagiarism: A Typology and Case Studies for Researchers and Editors. Research Ethics Forum. Springer International Publishing; 2020:13-36. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46711-1_2
  80. Dougherty MV. The use of confidentiality and anonymity protections as a cover for fraudulent fieldwork data. Research Ethics. 2021. doi:10.1177/17470161211018257
  81. Dubner SJ. 2024. Can Academic Fraud Be Stopped? Freakonomics. (Podcast Episode)
  82. Eaton S E. 2024. Supporting Graduate Students to Avoid Predatory Publishing and Questionable Conferences. In P Habibie & I Fazel (Eds.), Predatory Practices in Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Sharing (pp. 183-197). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003170723 (Book Chapter)
  83. Eko L, Koerber A, Starkey JC, Ardon-Dryer K, Cummins RG, Kee KF. 2023. Ethical, Legal, and Policy Issues in the Knowledge Creation Paradigm: The Case of OMICS International, Open Access, and ‘Predatory’ Publishing. In The Predatory Paradox: Ethics, Politics, and Practices in Contemporary Scholarly Publishing. pp. 37-72. doi: 10.11647/obp.0364.02 (Book Chapter)
  84. El Comité Español de Ética de la Investigación. 2024. Informe sobre integridad en la investigación científica y técnica. Consejo de Política Científica, Tecnológica y de Innovación. https://www.ciencia.gob.es/InfoGeneralPortal/documento/b5fcf7ef-48b0-48d6-b730-a5e3cd111489 (Government Report)
  85. Elango B. 2021. Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors. Scientometrics 126, 3965–3981. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-03895-1
  86. Eldakar MAM, Shehata AMK. 2023. A bibliometric study of article retractions in technology fields in developing economies countries. Scientometrics. 128:6047-6083. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04823-1 (Journal Article – Research)
  87. Endres J, Graber MA, Dachs R. 2015. If It Seems Too Good To Be True. American Family Physician. May 15, 2015.
  88. Fanelli D, Wong J, Moher D. 2021. What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses. Accountability in Research. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1947810
  89. Feng L, Yuan J, Yang L. An observation framework for retracted publications in multiple dimensions. Scientometrics, 2020;125(2):1445-1457. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03702-3
  90. Feng S, Feng L, Han F, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Wang L, Yuan J. 2024. Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field. Scientometrics. 129:4795-4817. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05101-4 (Journal Article – Research)
  91. Fiore M, Alfieri A, Pace MC, Simeon V, Chiodini P, Leone S, Wirz S, Cuomo A, Stoia V, Cascella M. 2021. A scoping review of retracted publications in anesthesiology. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 15(2):179-88. doi:10.4103/sja.sja_1110_20 (Journal Article – Research)
  92. Flanagin A, Bibbins-Domingo K, Berkwits M, Christiansen SL. 2023. Nonhuman “Authors” and Implications for the Integrity of Scientific Publication and Medical Knowledge. JAMA. 329(8):637–639. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344 (Journal Article – Research)
  93. Fong EA, Wilhite AW, Hickman C, Lee Y. The Legal Consequences of Research Misconduct: False Investigators and Grant Proposals. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2020;48(2):331-339. doi:10.1177/1073110520935347
  94. Frampton G, Woods L, Scott DA. 2021. Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice. PLoS ONE. 16(10): e0258935 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258935 (Journal Article-Research)
  95. Freijedo-Farinas F, Ruano-Ravina A, Pérez-Ríos M, Ross J, Candal-Pedreira C. 2024. Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years. Scientometrics 129:2867–2882. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-04992-7 (Journal Article – Research)
  96. Freilich J, Soomi K. 2023. Is the Patent System Sensitive to Incorrect Information? The Review of Economics and Statistics. July 24 2023. pp. 1-38. doi:10.1162/rest_a_01353 (Journal Article-Research)
  97. Gaston TE, Ounsworth F, Senders T, Ritchie S, Jones E. Factors affecting journal submission numbers: Impact factor and peer review reputation. Learned Publishing. 2020;33(2):154-162. doi:10.1002/leap.1285
  98. Gaudino M, Robinson NB, Audisio K, Rahouma M, Benedetto U, Kurlansky P, Fremes SE. 2021. Trends and Characteristics of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature, 1971 to 2020. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2021;181(8):1118–1121. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1807
  99. George A, Gooberman-Hill R, Alfred J, Das N, Delgado M, Dunlop L, Gilmore I, Graf C, Madsen R, Matheson J, Padgett M, Watson J. 2024. Research Integrity in the UK. Annual statement of the UK Committee on Research Integrity. UK Committee on Research Integrity. https://ukcori.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/UK-Committee-on-Research-Integrity-Annual-Statement-2024-1.pdf (Government Report)
  100. Ghorbi A, Fazeli-Varzaneh M, Ghaderi-Azad E, Ausloos M, Kozak M. 2021. Retracted papers by Iranian authors: causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations. Scientometrics. 126:7351–7371. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04104-9
  101. González-Márquez R, Schmidt L, Schmidt BM, Berens P, Kobak D. 2024. The landscape of biomedical research. Patterns. 5(6):100968. doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100968 (Journal Article – Research)
  102. Grey, A., Portch, R., Gaby, A., Grey, H. and Bolland, M., 2020. Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrity. Accountability in Research. 2020;28(3):149-161. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1813580
  103. Grey A, Avenell A, Bolland M. 2021. Timeliness and content of retraction notices for publications by a single research group. Accountability in Research. Online First. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1920409
  104. Grimes DR. 2024. Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research. BJC Reports. 2:65. doi:10.1038/s44276-024-00090-6 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  105. Guerra L. 2024. Citation Metrics and Strategic Mutations of Scientific Research: Narratives and Evidence. JLIS.It. 15(1):144-58. doi:10.36253/jlis.it-538.
  106. Gupta S, Singh VK, Banshal SK. 2024. Altmetric data quality analysis using Benford’s law. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05061-9 (Journal Article – Research)
  107. Hami A, Jahani Y, Mousavi AS. 2024. Analysis of the Researchers’ Citation of Retracted Articles in the Field of Orthopedics. Iranian Journal of Southern Medicine. 26(4):260-272.
  108. Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers. Scientometrics 126, 5181–5199 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03962-7 (Journal Article – Research)
  109. Hawkes N. Inquiry into eminent psychologist failed to list many unsafe papers, biographer claims. BMJ. 2019;367. doi:10.1136/bmj.l6329
  110. Heibi I, Peroni S. 2021. A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: the Wakefield 1998 et al.’s case. Scientometrics. 126:8433–8470. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04097-5 (Journal Article – Research)
  111. Heibi I, Peroni S. 2022. A quantitative and qualitative citation analysis of retracted articles in the humanities. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(4): 953-975. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00222 (Journal Article – Research)
  112. Herrmann-Lingen C. 2024. “Verantwortungsvolle Wissenschaftsbewertung in der Medizin – was zählt?” In Biesenbender S, Hartstein J, eds. Qualitätsmessung als Prisma. Springer VS Wiesbaden. pp. 1-18. (Book Chapter)
  113. Hesselmann F, Graf V, Schmidt M, Reinhart M. The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current sociology, 2017;65(6):814-845. doi:10.1177/0011392116663807
  114. Hesselmann F, Reinhart M. Cycles of invisibility: The limits of transparency in dealing with scientific misconduct. Social Studies of Science. 2021;51(3):414-438. doi: 10.1177/0306312720975201
  115. Hilliard AJ, Sugden N, Bass KM, Gunter C. 2024. Survey-Based Analysis of a Science of Science Communication Scientific Interest Group: Member Feedback and Perspectives on Science Communication. bioRxiv. Posted June 28, 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.06.25.600615 (Preprint – Research)
  116. Hodgkinson M. 2023. Reporting Research Misconduct: When, How and To Whom. UK Research Integrity Office. Version 10. doi:10.37672/UKRIO.2023.03.reportingresearchmisconduct (Organization Report – Guideline)
  117. Horbach SPJM, Halffman W. Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? Minerva. 2019;58:139-161. doi:10.1007/s11024-019-09388-z
  118. Horton J, Krishna Kumar D, Wood A. Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: The case of Professor James Hunton. Research Policy. 2020;49(8):104084. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104084
  119. Hwang SY, Yon DK, Lee SW, Kim MS, Kim JY, Smith L, Koyanagi A, Solmi M, Carvalho AF,  Kim E, Shin JI, Ioannidis JPA. 2023. Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 38(41):e333. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e333 (Journal Article – Research)
  120. Hyatt M, Thiruvathukal GK, Moreira D. 2024. Robust Source Attribution of Synthetically Generated Western Blot Images. figshare. Journal Contribution posted on 61/6/2024. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24954600 (Technical Report-Preprint – Research)
  121. Ibrahim S, Saw A. 2020. The Perils of Predatory Journals and Conferences. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal.14(2):1-6. doi:10.5704/MOJ.2007.003
  122. Ing EB. 2021. A Survey-Weighted Analytic Hierarchy Process to Quantify Authorship. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 12:1021-103. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S328648 (Journal Article – Research)
  123. Ioannidis JPA. 2024. Features and signals in precocious citation impact: a meta-research study. bioRxiv. October 15, 2024. doi:10.1101/2024.10.14.618366 (Preprint – REsearch)
  124. Ioannidis JPA, Pezzullo AM, Cristiano A, Boccia S, Baas J. 2024. Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators including retraction data. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/2024.09.16.613258 (Preprint – Research Article)
  125. Iqbal T. 2024. Research article retraction: causes, consequences and preventive measures. Pakistan Journal of Physiology. 20(3):1-2. doi:10.69656/pjp.v20i3.1668 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  126. Jamieson KH. 2021. How conspiracists exploited COVID-19 science. Nature Human Behaviour. 5:1464-1465. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01217-2.
  127. Johnson, Jr SD. 2021. Catastrophic failure: How COVID-19 was relayed from the media to the public. Digitial Commons: DePaul Unversity College of Communication Master of Arts Theses. 35.
  128. Kadykalo AN, Haddaway NR, Rytwinski T, Cooke SJ. 2021. Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID-19 environmental science and a fit-for-purpose evidence base. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 2:e12041. doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12041
  129. Kalmar E, Elzer T, Nastase N, Bolhuis T, Germain N, Rietveld M, Tao Y, de Wolff S. 2024. Trust in open publishing practices. F1000Research. 13:851. doi:10.12688/f1000research.152168.1 (Journal Article – Research)
  130. Kar S. 2024. A Fair Possibility of Tracking Scientific Retractions through Crossref for Sustainability of Science. Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies. 3(1):90-92. doi:10.5530/jcitation.3.1.9 (Journal Article – Research)
  131. Kennedy JE. 2024. Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies–including legal points and data management that prevents fraud. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 9:1-16. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1397649 (Journal Article – Research)
  132. Khan H, Gupta P, Zimba O, Gupta L. 2022. Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Retracted Articles on COVID-19. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 37(6):e44. doi:10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e44 (Journal Article – Research)
  133. Khan R, Joshi A, Kaur K, Sinhababu A, Chakravarty R. 2024. Retractions in academic publishing: insights from highly ranked global universities. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. Published ahead of print. doi:10.1108/GKMC-01-2024-0037 (Journal Article – Research)
  134. Kharasch ED. 2021. Scientific Integrity and Misconduct—Yet Again. Anesthesiology. 135:377-379. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003916
  135. Khatter A, Naughton M, Dambha-Miller H, Redmond P. 2021, Is rapid scientific publication also high quality? Bibliometric analysis of highly disseminated COVID-19 research papers. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1403
  136. Khurana P, Sharma K, Uddin Z. 2024. Unraveling retraction dynamics in COVID-19 research: Patterns, reasons, and implications. Accountability in Research. Published online on July 23, 2024. doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2379906 (Journal Article – Research)
  137. Kim SY, Yi HJ, Cho H-M, Huh S. How many retracted articles indexed in KoreaMed were cited 1 year after retraction notification. Sci Ed. 2019;6(2):122-127. doi:10.6087/kcse.172
  138. Kinney N, Wubah A, Roig M, Garner HR. 2021. Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts. Research Integrity and Peer Review. 6:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-020-00106-y
  139. Kodvanj I, Homolak J, Virag D, Trkulja V. 2022. Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues. Scientometrics. 127:1339-1352. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04249-7 (Journal Article – Research)
  140. Kohl CBS, Faggion Jr CM. 2023. A comprehensive overview of studies that assessed article retractions within the biomedical sciences. Accountability in Research. 31(6):557-575. doi:10.1080/08989621.2022.2154660 (Journal Article – Research)
  141. Koo M, Lin SC. 2024. Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science. Heliyon. 10(20):e38620. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620 (Journal Article – Research)
  142. Kovacs M, Varga MA, Dianovics D, Poldrack RA Aczel B. 2024. Opening the black box of article retractions: exploring the causes and consequences of data management errors. Royal Society Open Science. 12(1):12240844. doi:10.1098/rsos.240844
  143. Kramer K. 2021. Publishers grapple with an invisible foe as huge organised fraud hits scientific journals. Chemistry World. May 25, 2021.
  144. Kroon C, Breuer L, Jones L, An J, Akan A, Ali EAM, Busch F, Fislage M, Ghosh B, Hellrigel-Holderbaum M, Kazezian V, Koppold A, Restrepo CAM, Riedel N, Scherschinski L, Gonzalez FRU, Weissgerber T. 2022. Blind spots on western blots: Assessment of common problems in western blot figures and methods reporting with recommendations to improve them. PLOS Biology. 20(9): e3001783. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001783 (Journal Article – Research)
  145. Kumar A, Siwach AK. 2024. Analysis of Indian Retracted Publications: A Study Based on Scopus Data. The Serials Librarian. Published online May 19, 2024 ahead of print. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2024.2306396
  146. Lawrence B. 2024. Frontiers’ journals saw large scale retractions—where does that leave the publisher’s reputation with researchers? BMJ. 384:q659. doi: 10.1136/bmj.q659
  147. Lefkowitz J. 2023. Values and Ethics of Industrial-organizational Psychology. Taylor & Francis. ISBN:9781000839630,100083963X (Book)
  148. Lesk M, Mattern JB, Sandy HM. Are Papers with Open Data More Credible? An Analysis of Open Data Availability in Retracted PLoS Articles In: International Conference on Information. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer; 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_14
  149. Levchenko M, Parkin M, McEntyre J, Harrison M. 2024. Enabling preprint discovery, evaluation, and analysis with Europe PMC. PLoS ONE. 19(9): e0303005. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0303005 (Journal Article – Research) Published as preprint in BioRxiv.
  150. Li W, Mol BW. Re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2019;126(10):1289-1289. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15829
  151. Li-Wan-Po A, Peterson GM. 2020. Drug compliance and the Morisky Adherence Scale: An expression of concern and a warning. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 46:1-3. doi:10.1111/jcpt.13325.
  152. Lin Y, Chen M. 2022. “The more important findings are sustained”: A diachronic perspective on the genre of the retraction notice. English for Specific Purposes. 67:18-30. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2022.03.002 (Journal Article – Research)
  153. Linacre S. September 5, 2024. Shining a light on conflict of interest statements. Digital Science. (Blog Post)
  154. Lightner T, Roy S, London J, Edwards M. 2021. “Racing the Sun”: A Narrative Analysis of Engineering Graduate Students’ Journeys Navigating Public-Inspired Science Work. 2021 ASEE Annual Conference. doi: 10.18260/1-2–36535. (Conference Paper – Research)
  155. Liu X, Chen X. 2020. Authors’ noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(4):473-477. doi:10.1002/asi.24419 (Journal Article – Research)
  156. Loadsman JA. Why does retraction take so much longer than publication? Anaesthesia. 2019;74(1):3-5. doi:10.1111/anae.14484
  157. Locak Z. 2024. Publication Ethics in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 39(33):e249. doi:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e249. (Journal Article – Review)
  158. Lowe D. April 17, 2024. There Are Mistakes, And There Are Mistakes. Science. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/there-are-mistakes-and-there-are-mistakes (Journal Blog: Commentary)
  159. Lupia A, Allison DB, Jamieson KH, Heimberg J, Skipper M, Wolf SM. 2024. Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(11):p.e2319488121. doi:10.1073/pnas.2319488121
  160. Maccaro A, Piaggio D, Dodaro CA, Pecchia L. 2021. Biomedical engineering and ethics: reflections on medical devices and PPE during the first wave of COVID-19. BMC Medical Ethics. 22:130. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00697-1 (Journal Article – Research)
  161. Maddi A, Monneau E, Guaspare-Carton C, Gargiulo F, Dubois M. 2024. Streetlight effect in PubPeer comments: are Open Access publications more scrutinized? Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05053-9 (Journal Article – Research)
  162. Malkov D, Yaqub O, Siepel J. 2023. The spread of retracted research into policy literature. Quantitative Science Studies. 4 (1): 68–90. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00243
  163. Mani G, Hope T. Viral Science: Masks, Speed Bumps, and Guard Rails. Patterns. 2020;1(6). doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100101
  164. Mansourzadeh MJ, Ghazimirsaeid J, Motamedi N, Najafi A, Abubakar AA, Dehdarirad H. A Survey of Iranian Retracted Publications Indexed in PubMed. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(1):188-194.
  165. Marcus A, Oransky I, De Cassai A. 2024. Please don’t cite this editorial. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia. In Press, Corrected Proof. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111741 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  166. Margry PJ. On Scholarly Misconduct and Fraud, and What We Can Learn from It. Ethnologia Europaea. 14:30;49(2). doi:10.16995/ee.1646
  167. Marshall MB, Pinfield S, Abbott P, Cox A, Alperin JP, Barata GF, Chtena N, Dorsch I, Fleerackers A, Oliveira M, Peters I. 2024. The impact of COVID-19 on the debate on open science: a qualitative analysis of published materials from the period of the pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 11:1315. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03804-w (Journal Article – Research)
  168. Mavrogenis AF, Scarlat MM. 2023. Quality peer review is mandatory for scientific journals: ethical constraints, computers, and progress of communication with the reviewers of International Orthopaedics. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 47, 605–609. doi:10.1007/s00264-023-05715-y
  169. McFall-Johnsen M. 2024. An AI-generated rat with a giant penis highlights a growing crisis of fake science that’s plaguing the publishing business. Business Insider. Published March 18, 2024. (News Article)
  170. Menshawey R, Menshawey E, Mahamud BA. 2023. A Mummers Farce – Retractions of Medical Papers Conducted in Egyptian Institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics. 22:395-412. doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09494-4 (Journal Article – Research)
  171. Menshawey R, Menshawey E, Mitkees A, Mahamud BA. 2023. A plagiarism paperdemic: determining plagiarism among COVID-19 articles in infectious disease journals between 2020 and 2021. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 47:151. doi:10.1186/s42269-023-01129-3 (Journal Article – Research)
  172. Million AJ, Budd J. 2024. Disinformation in Science: Ethical Considerations for Citing Retracted Works. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 61(1):257-265. doi:10.1002/pra2.1025 (Journal Article – Research)
  173. Minetto S, Pisaturo D, Cermisoni GC, Vanni VS, Pagliardini L, Papaleo E, Berghella V, Mol BW, Alteri A. 2024. Are you aware of your citations? A crosssectional survey on improper citations of retracted articles in assisted reproduction. RBMO. 49(5):104366. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104366
  174. Mistry V, Grey A, Bolland MJ. Publication rates after the first retraction for biomedical researchers with multiple retracted publications. Accountability in Research. 2019;26(5):277-287. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1612244
  175. Mole B. 4/4/2024. 101 studies flagged as bogus COVID cure pusher sees career unravel. Ars Technica. (Ezine Article)
  176. Moritz CP. 2020. 40 years Western blotting: A scientific birthday toast. Journal of Proteomics. 212:103575. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103575 (Journal Article – Review)
  177. Mott A, Fairhurst C, Torgerson D. 2019. Assessing the impact of retraction on the citation of randomized controlled trial reports: an interrupted time-series analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 24(1):44-51. doi:10.1177/1355819618797965 (Journal Article – Research)
  178. Mousavi AS, Global Y, Hami A. 2023. Analysis of researchers’ reference status to discredited articles in the field of orthopedics.{Translated Title} Iranian Journal of Southern Medicine. 26(4): 260-272.
  179. Moussa S. 2023. Journal hijacking: Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing as a victim and the impacts. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing. 29(1):1-5. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1817 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  180. Naddaf M. 2024. Retraction notices are getting clearer — but progress is slow. Nature. Published July 26, 2024. doi:10.1038/d41586-024-02423-4 (Journal Article – News)
  181. Nagarkar S. 2024. “Research paper mills”: A factory outlet for dubious research. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 9(2):222-227. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2024.025 (Journal Article – Research)
  182. Nagella AB, Madhugiri VS. 2020. Journal Retraction Rates and Citation Metrics: An Ouroboric Association? Cureus. 12(11):e11542. doi:10.7759/cureus.11542
  183. Nair LB, Ascani A. 2022. Addressing low-profile misconduct in management academia through theoretical triangulation and transformative ethics education. The International Journal of Management Education. 20(3):100728. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100728
  184. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2024. Understanding and Addressing Misinformation About Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/27894
  185. Nato CG, Tabacco L, Bilotta F. Fraud and retraction in perioperative medicine publications: what we learned and what can be implemented to prevent future recurrence. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2021. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107252
  186. Nogueira TE, Gonçalves AS, Leles CR, Batista AC, Costa LR. A survey of retracted articles in dentistry. BMC Research Notes. 2017;10(253):1-8.
  187. Nosek BA, Hardwicke TE, Moshontz H, Allard A, Corker KS, Dreber A, Fidler F, Hilgard J, Struhl MK, Nuijten MB, Rohrer JM, Romero F, Scheel AM, Schere LD, Schonbrodt FD, Vazire S. 2022. Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science. Annual Review of Psychology. 73:719-748. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157
  188. Oikonomidi T, Boutron I, Pierre O, Cabanac G, Ravaud P, COVID-19 NMA Consortium. 2020. Changes in evidence for studies assessing interventions for COVID-19 reported in preprints: meta-research study. BMC Medicine. 18:402. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01880-8 (Journal Article – Research)
  189. Olckers M, Walsh T. 2024. Manipulation and peer mechanisms: A survey. Artificial Intelligence. 336:104196. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104196 (Journal Article – Research)
  190. Oranksy I, Fremes SE, Kurlansky P, Gaudino M. 2021. Retractions in medicine: the tip of the iceberg. European Heart Journal. 42:4205-4206. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab398
  191. Otake T. April 9, 2024. Little change in Japan’s research sector 10 years after stem cell fraud. The Japan Times. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/04/09/japan/science-health/10-years-since-stap/ (Newspaper Article)
  192. Ozair A, Bhat V. Omama M. Retractions and Withdrawals in Neurology Literature: A 2020 Analysis of the Retraction Watch Database. Neurology. 2021;96(15 Supplement):2668.
  193. Palla IA, Singson M, Thiyagarajan S. A comparative analysis of retracted papers in Health Sciences from China and India. Accountability in Research. 2020;27(7):401-416. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1754804 (Journal Article – Research)
  194. Pantziarka P, Meheus L. Journal retractions in oncology: a bibliometric study. Future Oncology. 2019;15(31):3597-3608. doi:10.2217/fon-2019-0233
  195. Park J, Lee JY, Kwon O-J. How the retracted publications are managed and used? A South Korean case. 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. 2018:7.
  196. Parker L, Boughton S, Bero L, Byrne JA. 2024. Paper mill challenges: past, present, and future. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 176:111549. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111549 (Journal Article – Research)
  197. Paruzel-Czachura M, Baran L, Spendel Z. 2021. Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research. Research Ethics. 17(3):375-397. doi:10.1177/1747016120980562
  198. Phelps RP. 2024. Worse than Plagiarism: False Firstness Claims and Dismissive Literature Reviews. Minding the Campus (webpage). Posted 2/9/2024. https://www.mindingthecampus.org/2024/02/09/worse-than-plagiarism-false-firstness-claims-and-dismissive-literature-reviews/
  199. Picazo D, Pérez-Piñón MT, Contreras CP, Sagarnaga-Chávez D. La estafa académica: fraude en las publicaciones científicas. TECNOCIENCIA Chihuahua. 2019;13(3):135-139.
  200. Piccoli GB. Ethics of publication, between forgery, retraction and protecting freedom: an ENJOY score for authors and editors. J Nephrol. 2019;32(6):847-850. doi:10.1007/s40620-019-00645-8
  201. Pierik J. October 25, 2022. ‘Embarrassing blemish’ to McCrory’s reputation, but no taint on AFL work: report. The Sydney Morning Herald. (Newspaper Article)
  202. Purvis AJ, Crawford J. 20204. Ethical Standards in Social Science Publications. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(09). doi:10.53761/hqnqr710 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  203. Qi Q, Huang J, Wu Y, Pan Y, Zhuang J, Yang X. 2024. Recent trends: Retractions of articles in the oncology field. Heliyon. 10(12):e33007. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33007 (Journal Article – Research)
  204. Quintans-Júnior LJ, Martins-Filho PR. 2024. Oops! … They did it again-The Reasons Behind so Many Retractions of Scientific Articles. Archives of Medical Research. 35(7):103056. (Journal Article – Letter/Commentary)
  205. Rahman MT. 2024. Should we penalise scientific misconduct in rankings scores? University world News. Published February 24, 2024. (News Article)
  206. Reilly I. Public Deception as Ideological and Institutional Critique: On the Limits and Possibilities of Academic Hoaxing. Canadian Journal of Communication. 2020;45(2). doi:10.22230/cjc.2020v45n2a3667
  207. Reville W. 20204. The credibility crisis in science. The Irish Times. Published on March 21, 2024. (News Article)
  208. Ribeiro MD, Vasconcelos S. Should corrections of the literature influence grant review? PsyArXiv Preprints. 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/49vpa.
  209. Rivera H. 2023. Scientific integrity faces plagiarism fabricated with the ChatGPT. Revista Médica el Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. 61(6):857-862. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10064458 (Journal Article – Research)
  210. Robert JS. 2024. Should research administrators be regulated as carefully as researchers? Bioessays. Published online on March 27, 2024 ahead of Print. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202300196
  211. Rodionov V. April 11, 2024. Holes in the ‘holey graphyne’ story. Chemistry World. https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/holes-in-the-holey-graphyne-story/4019235.article (Magazine Article)
  212. Rodriguez-Ramallo H, Báez-Gutiérrez N, Aparicio Castellano B. 2024. 6ER-015 Retracted pharmacology articles: a cross-sectional study using the retraction watch database. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 31:A231. (Conference Abstract – Research)
  213. Rong LQ, Leshem E, Kaplan JA. Further Retractions of Dr. Joachim Boldt in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. Article in Press, published online November 15, 2024. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.11.016 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  214. Rossello G, Martinelli A. 2024. Breach of academic values and misconduct: the case of Sci-Hub. Scientometrics. 129:5227–5263. doi:10.1007/s11192-024-05046-8
  215. Rossouw TM, Matsau L, van Zyl C. 2020. An Analysis of Retracted Articles with Authors or Co-authors from the African Region: Possible Implications for Training and Awareness Raising. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 15(5):478-493. doi: 10.1177/1556264620955110 (Journal Article – Research)
  216. Sacco DF, Namuth AJ, Macchione AL, Brown M. 2024. Differences in Support for Retractions Based on Information Hazards Among Undergraduates and Federally Funded Scientists. Journal of Academic Ethics. Published online before print. 10.1007/s10805-024-09505-y (Journal Article – Review)
  217. Schneider J, Ye D, Hill AM, et al. Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data. Scientometrics. 2020;125: 2877–2913. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03631-1
  218. Schindler D, Yan E, Spors S, Krüger F. 2023. Retracted articles use less free and open-source software and cite it worse. Quantitative Science Studies. 4(4): 820–838. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00275 (Journal Article – Research)
  219. Sebbah B, Bousquet F, Cabanac G. 2022. Le journalisme scientifique
    à l’épreuve de l’actualité « tout covid » et de la méthode scientifique    . Les Cahiers du Journalisme – Recherches. 2(8-9):119-135. doi:10.31188/CaJsm.2(8-9).2022.R119 (Journal Article – Research)
  220. Sever R. 2023. Biomedical publishing: Past historic, present continuous, future conditional. PLOS Biology. 21(10): e3002234. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002234 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  221. Shakirova SM. 2023. Case study on retraction of articles by Thinking Skills and Creativity journal. Science Editor and Publisher. 8(1):38-45. doi: 10.24069/SEP-23-16 (Journal Article – Research)
  222. Sharma K, Mukherjee S. 2024. The ripple effect of retraction on an author’s collaboration network. Journal of Computational Social Science. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00278-3
  223. Shi A, Bier B, Price C, Schwartz L, Wairight D, Whithaus A, Abritis A, Oranksy I, Angrist M. 2024. Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality. Accountability in Research. In Press Jun 25, 2024. doi:10.1080/08989621.2024.2366281 (Journal Article – Research)
  224. Siegerink B, Pet LA, Rosendaal FR, Erkens MYHG. 2023. The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678 (Journal Article – Research)
  225. Sinder J. Correcting the Record: Law Journals and Scholarly Integrity in the Digital Age. Social Science Research Network; 2020. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3521475
  226. Singh A, Botros M, Guirguis P, Punreddy A, Mesfin A, Puvanesarajah V. 2024. Prevalence, Characteristics, and Trends in Retracted Spine Literature: 2000–2023. World Neurosurgery. In Press: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.080. (Journal Article – Research)
  227. Smith EM. Reimagining the peer-review system for translational health science journals. Clinical and Translational Science. 2021. doi:10.1111/cts.13050
  228. Solomon RV. 2023. Breaking free from academic scams: Five key reflections on the cloned journal conundrum. Learned Publishing. 31(1):44-48. doi:10.1002/leap.1590 (Journal Article – Commentary)
  229. Soltani P, Patini R. Retracted COVID-19 articles: a side-effect of the hot race to publication. Scientometrics. 2020;125(1):819-822. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03661-9
  230. Sotudeh H, Barahmand N, Yousefi Z, Yaghtin M. How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition. Journal of Information Science. Published online July 29, 2020:0165551520945853. doi:10.1177/0165551520945853
  231. Sotudeh H, Saber Z, Aloni FG, Mirzabeigi M, Khunjush F. 2022. A longitudinal study of the evolution of opinions about open access and its main features: a twitter sentiment analysis. Scientometrics. 127:5587-5611. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04502-7 (Journal Article – Research)
  232. Spieseke M (2021). Retraction Watch oder „Bitte nicht zitieren!“. Free University of Berlin Library Blog. 14 December. (News Article – Blog post)
  233. Sra MS, Arora M, Mazumder A, Goyal RM, Parameswaran G. Meena JK (2022). Comparative analysis of retracted pre-print and peer-reviewed articles on COVID-19. medRxiv. (Preprint – Research)
  234. Stamm T. From honest mistakes to fake news – approaches to correcting the scientific literature. Head & Face Medicine. 2020;16(1):6. doi:10.1186/s13005-020-00220-8 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  235. Stoff J, McIntosh L, Lee AC. 2024. Transparency and Integrity Risks in China’s Research Ecosystem: A Primer and Call to Action. Center for Research Security & Integrity: Virginia, USA. (Research Report)
  236. Suelzer EM, Deal J, Hanus KL, Ruggeri B, Sieracki R, Witkowski E. 2019. Assessment of Citations of the Retracted Article by Wakefield et al With Fraudulent Claims of an Association Between Vaccination and Autism. JAMA Network Open. 2019;2(11):e1915552. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15552 (Journal Article – Research)
  237. Svare BB. A Cautionary Tale for Psychology and Higher Education in Asia: Following Western Practices of Incentivising Scholarship May Have Negative Outcomes. Psychology and Developing Societies. 2020;32(1):94-121. doi:10.1177/0971333619900043 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  238. Svarstad J. 2023. Norges mest publiserende forsker ble frikjent for juks. Nå er 12 av artiklene hans flagget [Norway’s most published researcher was acquitted of cheating. Now 12 of his articles have been flagged]. Kunnskapsavisen Khrono. May 15, 2023. (News Article)
  239. Szakal FD (2021). Retracting publications doesn’t stop them from influencing science. Massive Science. 15 March. (News Article)
  240. Szilagyi I-S, Schittek G, Klivinyi C, Simonis H, Ulrich T, Bornemann-Cimenti H (2022). Citation of retracted research: a case-controlled, ten-year follow-up scientometric analysis of Scott S. Reuben’s malpractice. Scientometics. 127, 2611–2620. (Journal Article – Research)
  241. Tao W, Yong-Hong L, Xing Q-R (2020). Characteristics of retracted systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the biomedical literature. Research Square. (Preprint – Research)
  242. Taylor SC, Rosselli-Murai LK, Crobeddu B, Plante I. 2022. A critical path to producing high quality, reproducible data from quantitative western blot experiments. Scientific Reports. 12. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22294-x (Journal Article – Research)
  243. Thomson C, Reiter E, Belz A. 2024. Common Flaws in Running Human Evaluation Experiments in NLP. Computational Linguistics. 50(2):795-805. doi:10.1162/coli_a_00508 (Journal Article – Research)
  244. Tran N. September 23, 2024. The ‘publish or perish’ mentality is fuelling research paper retractions – and undermining science. The Conversation. (News Article)
  245. Trejo-Pech CO, Thach SV, Thompson JM, Manley J. 2021. Violations of Standard Practices by Predatory Economics Journals, Serials Review, doi: 10.1080/00987913.2021.1959183 (Journal Article – Research)
  246. Tucker R (2020). Substandard COVID-19 research is cause for concern. Hospital Healthcare Europe. 12 October. (News Article – Editorial)
  247. UK Committee on Research Integrity. 2023. Research Integrity in the UK: Annual statement 2023. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8117154 (Government Report)
  248. Urban MC, Merow C, Wegrzyn JL, Maitner BS, Corcoran D (2021). How to publish at pandemic speed. BioScience. 71(10), 1001-1003. (Journal Article – Editorial)
  249. Valdez D, Goodson P. Language Bias in Health Research: External Factors That Influence Latent Language Patterns. Front Res Metr Anal. 2020;5. doi:10.3389/frma.2020.00004 (Journal Article – Research)
  250. Van Der Walt W, WIllems KA, Friedrich W, Hatus S, Krauss (2020). Retracted COVID-19 papers and the levels of ‘citation pollution’: A preliminary analysis and directions for further research. Cahiers de la Documentation. 2020(3-4). (Journal Article – Research)
  251. Van Noorden R. 2021. Hundreds of gibberish papers still lurk in the scientific literature. Nature. 594, 160-161. doi:10.1038/d41586-021-01436-7 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  252. Van Noorden R. 2023. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record. Nature, 624, 479-481. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8. (Journal Article – Editorial)
  253. van Schalkwyk F, Dudek J (2022). Reporting preprints in the media during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science. 31(5). (Journal Article – Research)
  254. Voormolen S (2022). Studie over zonneschijnvitamine gaat ten onder. NRC. 29 April. (News Article)
  255. Vvedenskaya EV. 2022. Пандемия публикаций”: проблемы добросовестности в науке. Науковедческие Исследования. 4:7-27. doi: 10.31249/scis/2022.04.01 (Journal Article – Research).
  256. Wadhwa RR, Rasendran C, Popovic ZB, Nissen SE, Desai MY. 2021. Temporal Trends, Characteristics, and Citations of Retracted Articles in Cardiovascular Medicine. JAMA Network Open. 4(7):e2118263. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18263
  257. Wager E, Kleinert S, et al., on behalf of the CLUE Working Group. et al. Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(6). doi:10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3
  258. Wait K, Roy S, Katner A, Pruden A, Puchase J, Lopez K, Kriss R, Odimayomi T, Edwards M. 2024. A Citizen Science Approach to Evaluating Consumer Water SafetyConcerns (2011−2022). ACS EST Water. 4(4):1260–1273. doi:10.1021/acsestwater.4c00090 (Journal Article – Perspective)
  259. Waltman L, Pinfield S, Rzayeva N, Oliveira Herigues S, Fang Z,….Swaminathan S (2021). Scholarly communication in times of crisis: The response of the scholarly communication system to the COVID-19 pandemic. Research on Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17125394.v1 (Report)
  260. Wang T, Yong Hong L, Xing QR. Characteristics of retracted systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the biomedical literature. Research Square. July 21, 2020. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-45086/v1 (Preprint – Research)
  261. Wang P, Su J. 2022. Expert-recommended biomedical journal articles: Their retractions or corrections, and post-retraction citing. Journal of Information Science. doi: 10.1177/01655515221074329 (Journal Article – Research)
  262. Weitzman, H (2021). A way out of the replication crisis. Chicago Booth Review. 16 March. (News Article)
  263. Wentao L, Mol BW (2019). Re: Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG. 126(10), 1289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15829 (Journal Article – Letter to the Editor)
  264. West JD, Bergstrom CT. Misinformation in and about science. PNAS. 2021;118(15):e1912444117. doi:10.1073/pnas.1912444117 (Journal Article -Commentary/Editorial)
  265. Willinsky J, Pimentel D. The publication facts label: A public and professional guide for research articles. Learned Publishing. Early View published 2/21/2024. doi:10.1002/leap.1599
  266. Xu H, Ding Y, Zhang C, Tan BYC. 2023. Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articles. Research Policy. 52(7):104815. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104815 ((Journal Article – Research)
  267. Xu S, Hu G (2022). Retraction stigma and its communication via retraction notices. Minerva. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09465-w (Journal Article – Research)
  268. Yang S, Qi F, Diao H, Ajiferukea A (2022). Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 (Journal Article – Research)
  269. Yarborough M. Using the concept of “deserved trust” to strengthen the value and integrity of biomedical research. Account Res. 2020. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1855427 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  270. Young RG, Mitterboeck TF. Perspectives for early-career researchers on plagiarism and scientific integrity. FACETS. Published online January 13, 2020. doi:10.1139/facets-2019-0031 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  271. Yousafzai A (2021). Fraudulent research thriving in Pakistan due to HEC’s apathy. The New International. 25 October. (News Article)
  272. Yumru M, Herdi O (2022). The death decree of a scientific paper: Retraction. Turkish Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 25(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.5505/kpd.2022.35545 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  273. Zhao Y, Anand, Ajay; Sharma, Gaurav (2021): Reviewer Recommendations Using Document Vector Embeddings and a Publisher Database: Implementation and Evaluation. TechRxiv. (Preprint – Research/Review)
  274. Zheng ET, Fang Z, Fu HZ. 2024. Is gold open access helpful for academic purification? A causal inference analysis based on retracted articles in biochemistry. Information Processing & Management. 61(3):103640. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103640 (Journal Article – Research)
  275. Zheng ET, Fu HZ, Thelwall M, Fang Z. 2024. Can tweets predict article retractions? A comparison between human and LLM labelling (version 1 title: Can ChatGPT predict article retraction based on Twitter mentions?). arXiv. December 9, 2024. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.16851 (Preprint – Research)
  276. Zheng X, Chen J, Tollas A, Ni C. 2023. The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions. Journal of Informetrics. 17(3):101423. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2023.101423 (Journal Article – Research)
  277. Zhu H, Jia Y, Leung S. Citations of microRNA Biomarker Articles That Were Retracted: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(3):e243173. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3173 (Journal Article – Review)
  278. Zietman AL, Yom SS, Braverman LC. Making Sure Retractions Matter. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2019;103(5):1043-1044. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.001 (Journal Article – Editorial)
  279. Zivony A. May 17, 2024. ‘Grimpact’: psychological researchers should do more to prevent widespread harm. The Psychologist. (Society Publication – Commentary)
  280. Zuckerman H. Is “the time ripe” for quantitative research on misconduct in science? Quantitative Science Studies. 2020;1(3):945-958. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00065. Erratum, 2020(1):1653. (Journal Article – Editorial/Review)

Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, or subscribe to our daily digest. If you find a retraction that’s not in our database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].

By clicking submit, you agree to share your email address with the site owner and Mailchimp to receive marketing, updates, and other emails from the site owner. Use the unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.

Processing…
Success! You're on the list.