Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘weekend reads’ Category

Weekend reads: The risks of spotlighting reproducibility; harassment = scientific misconduct?; trouble with funnel plots

without comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured the case of a peer review nightmare, and a story about harassment by a would-be scientific critic. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

March 25th, 2017 at 10:00 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: Investigations need sunlight; should we name fraudster names?; how to kill predatory journals

with 5 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured a lawsuit threat following criticism of a popular education program, and the new editor of PLOS ONE’s explanation of why submissions are down. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

March 18th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: A publisher sends the wrong message on data sharing; jail for scientific fraud; pigs fly

with 14 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured three new ways companies are trying to scam authors, and a look at why one journal is publishing a running tally of their retractions. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

March 11th, 2017 at 9:31 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: How to speed up peer review; the whipsaw of science news headlines; data-sharing stance sparks resignation request

with 3 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured more fallout from a citation-boosting episode, and a look at when animal research becomes unnecessary and cruel. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

March 4th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: They committed misconduct, then earned $100 million in grants; collateral publishing damage

with 4 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured a frank admission of error by a Nobel Prize winner, and a look at five “diseases” plaguing science. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

February 25th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: The upside of predatory publishers; why no one replicates; the pain of manuscript submission

with 4 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured a retraction of a state senator’s paper, and an editor busted for citation boosting. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

February 18th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: Sugar paper tussle at a reunion; “Sex, lies, and video-taped experiments;” p-value harm?

without comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured the retraction of a psychology paper because of manipulation by an unnamed graduate student, and a tale about the cost of being a whistleblower, even when you’re successful. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

February 11th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: Sabotage in the lab; a lab animal database disappears; PACE authors push back

with 11 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured the launch of the greatest journal ever, and a story about the backlash against widely covered research on why men eat more. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

February 4th, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: Misbehaving medical academics; are phase I trials ethical?; the “sin” of mistakes

with 3 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured revelations about what happens when researchers unwittingly use a tool without permission, and a look at why women peer review less often than men. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 28th, 2017 at 9:54 am

Posted in weekend reads

Weekend reads: A course on calling bullshit?; What closure of Beall’s list means; More preprint debate

with 6 comments

The week at Retraction Watch featured the harrowing story of a would-be whistleblower subjected to a forced mental exam (part of our partnership with the news team at Science), and Jeffrey Beall’s site about predatory publishers going dark. Here’s what was happening elsewhere: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 21st, 2017 at 9:30 am

Posted in weekend reads