About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Archive for the ‘radiology’ Category

Do you see what I see? Heart imaging journal yanks cardiac study for plagiarism

with one comment

intjcardimagThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging has retracted a 2013 paper by a group of researchers from Italy. The reason: plagiarism.

The paper was titled “Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease,” and it came from scientists in Rome led by Francesco Pelliccia of the Department of Heart and Great Vessels at Sapienza University.

Read the rest of this entry »

About these ads

Written by amarcus41

April 4, 2014 at 11:00 am

Author who threatened to sue Retraction Watch has another paper withdrawn

with 30 comments

cureusBenjamin Jacob Hayempour, the researcher who threatened to sue us for asking questions about a retraction for plagiarism, has had another paper withdrawn.

The paper, published online in the journal Cureus, was titled “Novel Determinants of Tumour Radiosensitivity Post-Large-Scale Compound Library Screening” and had been available at http://www.cureus.com/articles/2394-novel-determinants-of-tumour-radiosensitivity-post-large-scale-compound-library-screening since January 13, but that URL now redirects to Cureus’s homepage.

We asked Cureus editor-in-chief John Adler for details, and he responded: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

January 17, 2014 at 5:14 pm

Weekend reads: Snarky acknowledgement sections, journal editors on fraud

with 6 comments

booksAnother busy week at Retraction Watch, beginning with a story we broke about faked HIV vaccine results that was picked up by the Des Moines Register and other outlets. Here’s what was happening elsewhere on the web: Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

December 28, 2013 at 9:30 am

Primary tumor article retracted for, well, not being primary

with 7 comments

bjrThe British Journal of Radiology has retracted a 2006 paper reporting a case study of an unusual primary cancer. Trouble is, their information was second-hand.

Here’s the notice for the article, titled “Primary extragonadal retroperitoneal teratoma in an adult”:  Read the rest of this entry »

Written by amarcus41

February 26, 2013 at 9:30 am

In detailed notice, radiology journal retracts lung cancer paper for likely plagiarism

with 4 comments

The editors of Acta Radiologica have retracted a study of patients with lung cancer, with a notice that tells the whole story:

The manuscript “Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated by non-surgical therapy” was submitted to Acta Radiologica on November 3, 2010 and, after a review, accepted for publication on February 26, 2011 (1). The article was published in Acta Radiol 2011;52:646–50. Authors were: Honjiang Yan, Renben Wang (corresponding author), Fen Zhao, Kubli Zhu, Shumei Jiang, Wei Zhao, and Rui Feng, from the Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Shandong Tumor Hospital, Jinan, China. Read the rest of this entry »

Written by ivanoransky

October 17, 2012 at 9:30 am

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,185 other followers