Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Top 10 retractions of 2017

with one comment

It’s time for the “Best of 2017” lists to start appearing — so why not do one for retractions? We think it’s a good idea, so have partnered with The Scientist for the last few years to compile our most notable notices of the year.

From new records to mass resignations, you can check out our picks for 2017 here.

Like Retraction Watch? Consider making a tax-deductible contribution to support our growth. You can also follow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, add us to your RSS reader, sign up on our homepage for an email every time there’s a new post, or subscribe to our daily digest. Click here to review our Comments Policy. For a sneak peek at what we’re working on, click here. If you have comments or feedback, you can reach us at retractionwatchteam@gmail.com.

Written by Alison McCook

December 18th, 2017 at 1:16 pm

Posted in RW announcements

Comments
  • Deepak December 20, 2017 at 3:30 am

    I appreciate the effort but wonder what were the basis of selecting these top 10. I feel 5 and 6 should have topped as they are author driven where they realized the mistake and came forward to retract the papers. This should be surely celebrated that the authors applauded.
    Lets not make genuine retractions as something to shy away from.

  • Post a comment

    Threaded commenting powered by interconnect/it code.