About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Camomile allergy case report retracted after patients withdraw consent post-publication

with 4 comments

aaciIn what may be a first, a researcher in Turkey has withdrawn a paper because the patients whose cases she described wthdrew their consent after it was published.

Here’s the notice, from Allergy, Asthma, & Clinical Immunology, of a paper titled “Severe contact dermatitis due to camomile: a common complementary remedy with potential sensitization risks:”

This article has been retracted by the authors. Although the patients originally gave consent to publication of their cases and images, they withdrew this consent shortly after publication. The article is no longer available online in order to protect patient confidentiality. The author apologizes for the inconvenience.

We’ve tried to contact Sibel Dogan, the author of the paper, to find out why the patients withdrew their consent, but haven’t heard back. In the meantime, here’s the abstract of the paper, which went online on July 15:

Camomile extracts and compositae mix containing herbal remedies are used for several alternative/complementary therapies for a long time. In fact, camomile has been used traditionally in eastern Anatolia as a pain relieving topical anesthetic agent. Besides becoming a popular herbal remedy, camomile is also known for its potential in inducing chemical burn, irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, conjunctivitis and anaphylaxis. Different clinical apperances of camomile allergy was reviewed with three patients using the same topical camomile remedy in this report.

We’ve seen at one case of retraction for breach of confidentiality, but that was because “details of participants that were not de-identified were sent between study sites.” We haven’t seen a case in which patients withdrew their consent after publication.

Hat tip: Rob Siebers

About these ads

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Can an informed consent be withdrawn AFTER publication?

    aceil

    August 19, 2013 at 10:09 am

    • Yes, if it wasn’t proper informed consent in the first place. But without details it’s impossible to judge the situation.

      Len

      August 19, 2013 at 2:24 pm

    • Even with informed consent, if a study participant withdraws consent and the human ethics committee that approved the study is aware that consent has been withdrawn, most researchers will do whatever it takes to avoid the wrath of the ethics committee. For most authors having a paper retracted is often a lesser problem than having a problem with an ethics committee, especially if the reason for the paper’s retraction is not due to wrong doings by the authors.

      SD

      August 21, 2013 at 7:47 pm

  2. It is really hard to see any wrongdoing by the researcher; it appears to be really bad to have to retract a paper due to retraction of consent. Is there any chance to publish a similar finding – just without any patients’ pictures, or just from another patient who gave the consent, and, perhaps, a few more cases in a table…

    Eibl

    August 19, 2013 at 2:35 pm


We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,339 other followers

%d bloggers like this: