A regretful retraction for plagiarism and duplication in Proteome Science
Just ask a group of Spanish researchers who published a 2011 paper in Proteome Science, then lost it this past April because they’d stolen text and a figure from previously published work — some, but not all of it, their own.
The retraction notice for “Clinical and technical phosphoproteomic research” tells the story:
This article  has been regretfully retracted by the Editors because of significant overlap with a figure and text from previously published articles [2-4]. We apologise to all affected parties for the inconvenience caused.
1. Lopez E, Lopez I, Ferreira A, Sequi J: Clinical and technical phosphoproteomic research. Proteome Sci 2011,9(1):27.
2. López E, Matthiesen R, López I, Ashman K, Mendieta J, Wesselink JJ, Gómez-Puertas P, Ferreira A: Functional phosphoproteomics tools for current immunological disorders research.
Journal of integrated omics 2011,1(1):1–16.
3. Ashman K, Villar EL: Phosphoproteomics and cancer research. Clin Transl Oncol 2009, 11(6):356–62.
4. Choudhary C, Mann M: Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010,11:427–439
The paper has been cited three times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge, including once by first author Elena Lopez.