About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

This is 40 (and 41): More retractions for Diederik Stapel

with 3 comments

stapel_npcIt turns out we missed two more recent retractions from Diederik Stapel. They were nestled in the table of contents of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology that contained four retractions we covered last week.

The notices, for “Method matters: Effects of explicit versus implicit social comparisons on activation, behavior, and self views” (cited 48 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge) and “From seeing to being: Subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations” (cited 95 times), both say the same thing:

This retraction follows the results of an investigation into the work of Diederik A. Stapel. The Noort Committee has determined data supplied by Diederik A. Stapel to be fraudulent. His co-author was unaware of his actions and was not involved in the collection of the fraudulent data.

These are retractions 40 and 41 for Stapel.

Hat tip: Fabian Strosche

About these ads

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 24, 2013 at 10:42 am

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. How many of his papers have NOT been retracted?

    Liz Goodall

    January 24, 2013 at 7:24 pm

  2. at what point do you stop counting?

    John

    January 25, 2013 at 6:38 am

    • More importantly, at what point does one stop caring? I think the first retraction has the most profound impact on the individual but then it asymptotically approaches zero as the number of retractions grows. My hypothesis is that for round numbers like 10th retraction, 100th retraction, 666th retraction the impact spikes but not by much. Stapel could actually share some first-hand experiences with this but I do not think he would be able to find a partner willing to process the data he provides.

      chirality

      January 25, 2013 at 6:50 am


We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34,471 other followers

%d bloggers like this: