About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Do as I say, not as I do? Duplication in ethics journal earns author five-year publishing ban

with 2 comments

j business ethicsThe next time a business professor in Thailand is looking for an ethics case study, he might look no further than the mirror.

Mohammad Asif Salam earned himself a five-year ban on publishing in a Springer journal after publishing work there that he’d already published elsewhere. Here’s the notice for “Corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply chain,” a paper which appeared in the Journal of Business Ethics in 2009:

The Editors and publisher regret to report that the paper published by Mohammad Asif Salam as ‘‘Corporate social responsibility in purchasing and supply chain’’ in the Journal of Business Ethics (2009), 85:355–370 is nearly identical to that published earlier by Mohammad Asif Salam as ‘‘Social responsibility in purchasing: the case of Thailand’’ in the International Journal of Procurement Management (2007), 1:97–116. This is a serious violation of publication ethics which according to the Springer Policy on Publishing Integrity warrants a retraction notice to be published in the journal and a ban from publishing ‘‘in any of the journal’s publications for an initial period of 5 years’’.

Alex C. Michalos

Michalos, editor of the journal, was quoting accurately from the Springer policy. We’ve seen a number of duplication retractions from Springer, but none that have mentioned a ban. Perhaps those other authors also earned one, but it just wasn’t included in the notice.

The paper has been cited nine times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge, while the International Journal of Procurement Management version has yet to be cited.

We’ve tried to reach Asif Salam — who earned a spot in Bangkok’s Assumption University’s Hall of Fame in 2004 — for comment, and will update with anything we learn.

Hat tip: Jane Robbins

About these ads

Written by Ivan Oransky

January 14, 2013 at 11:00 am

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. It’s amazing that you guys at RW are so on top of things to catch this retraction. It has, so far, escaped the attention it deserves among management scholars. I believe that this in part reflects journals’ lack of appropriate software to track potential contributions. A number of management journals have now adopted this software to prevent such errors – although the Lichtenthaler and Frey work probably wouldn’t have been caught with it. Many journals (such as AMJ) require a statement about what other papers have been or are in progress from the dataset. Nevertheless, the various action editors and reviewers should also due their diligence.
    For those fascinated by this subject, this recent analysis by Honig and Bedi is truly insightful and possibly the best paper published in AMLE last year: http://amle.aom.org/content/11/1/101.abstract
    Scary that 25% and 13% of management submissions (to the major conference in the field) show some or significant plagiarism!

    ST

    January 24, 2013 at 4:46 pm

    • @ST

      Since you brought up the Academy of Management, I wonder if anyone sees any problematic similarities between these two papers:

      John L. Campbell, 2007, “Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Academy of Management Review 2007, 32(3), 946–967.

      John L. Campbell, 2006, “Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility,” American Behavioral Scientist, 49: 925.

      Pro

      April 30, 2013 at 1:16 pm


We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34,902 other followers

%d bloggers like this: