About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

Failure at System — systems failure? — leads to duplicate publication, retraction

with 5 comments

systemcoverThe journal System evidently needs a new one — at least when it comes to production.

The publication has been forced to retract an article that it published twice — in the same issue.

Here’s what happened:

The publisher regrets sincerely that an error in its production office resulted in the below article appearing in this issue twice. To remedy this error, pages 522–532 from this issue have been retracted.

SYS, 40 (2012) 522–532, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.017. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn.

As a consequence, pages 522–532 related to the duplicate article are missing from the printed issue. The publisher sincerely apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause.

About these ads

Written by amarcus41

December 11, 2012 at 9:30 am

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Same has happened to me in 2003. Indoor Air published our article word for word in June and then again in September. They did publish a ‘correction’, however, both articles are still on PubMed and SCOPUS.

    Rob Siebers

    December 11, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    • That is one way to double your productivity!

      Steve

      December 11, 2012 at 3:58 pm

  2. Obviously this journal requires good editors and a half-decent publisher..

    Jawahar

    December 13, 2012 at 4:58 am

  3. Presuming that the original article actually has worthwhile, citeable content, what are the chances someone else working in the field will find first the retraction notice without reading it, and either ignore the article, or essentially reproduce it, believing that the initial article was retracted for bad results or worse?

    Anthony

    December 15, 2012 at 1:25 pm

    • Low — did you actually read the retraction notice? It very carefully doesn’t list authors or the title, and the text is unambiguous.

      JBL

      December 16, 2012 at 10:45 am


We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,385 other followers

%d bloggers like this: