About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

“This publication should be ignored”: Authorship issues, flawed data fell neuro-oncology paper » Neon 2009 regular volume.indd

leave a comment »

Neon 2009 regular volume.indd

We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31,387 other followers