About these ads

Retraction Watch

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process

So who bought ScienceBlogs? Retraction Watch exclusive: National Geographic

with 6 comments

This afternoon, PZ Myers, of the wildly popular Pharyngula blog on ScienceBlogs, started a post with a few lines that set science writers on Twitter abuzz:

I have news. Scienceblogs is going to be folded into a new organization sometime soon — basically, we’ve been bought. I can’t discuss all of the details just yet, but let’s just say it is a prestigious national magazine with a healthy bottom line that will do us a lot of good.

Retraction Watch has learned, from a source familiar with the negotiations, that the buyer is National Geographic. We don’t have any details at this point, and Nat Geo has not returned a request for comment [see update at end], but we are confident in reporting this.

Readers may recall PepsiGate, which led a number of bloggers to leave ScienceBlogs after the soft drink company was allowed to buy a blog on the site. The site’s owner, SEED Magazine, has struggled over the years.

We’ll add more details as we learn them.

Update, 3:20 p.m. Eastern, 4/26/11: National Geographic has just posted this on their press site:

National Geographic has assumed management of day-to-day operations for Scienceblogs.com, expanding a relationship with Seed Media Group that started when National Geographic took on ad sales responsibility for Scienceblogs.com in 2009.

Please see an update with more details.

About these ads

Written by Ivan Oransky

April 25, 2011 at 5:58 pm

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Oh hell yes. May it rise like the phoenix.

    Christopher Mims

    April 25, 2011 at 6:21 pm

  2. Agreed, Christopher. I specifically ruled out SB after the PepsiGate thing for Per Square Mile. Hopefully NatGeo will help burnish that image.

    Tim De Chant

    April 25, 2011 at 8:03 pm

  3. I’m still wary. NatGeo totally screwed the pooch on their “Real Pirates” exhibit in Norfolk, VA; hosted it at a U.S. Navy museum, whitewashed it completely (except for brief mentions in Black History Month), and left out quite a bit of context / information.

    There are worse organizations out there, but I put NatGeo only a couple steps above History Channel.

    Maxwell Despard

    April 26, 2011 at 6:46 am

  4. Considering how little Pharyngula has to do with science, I’m hoping Nat Geo will either give PZ the boot or rename the umbrella.

    Note: endless drones about Christianity do not qualify as science.

    John Spevacek

    April 26, 2011 at 7:45 am

  5. I hope National Geographic can help burnish SB post-PepsiGate. But there’s good reason to wait & see.

    For instance, the National Geographic Channel seems to have no idea what the advertising – editorial divide is all about:


    Or take a peek at what happened to filmmaker Robert Stone when he joined the blogging team for Nat Geo’s Energy Challenge (sponsored by Shell):


    Alan Mairson

    April 26, 2011 at 8:07 am

  6. Thought: I don’t know who their community manager is/will be, but they’ll need a ****ing talented one to handle that blogging community and properly squeeze the potential out of it. Otherwise… I dare not say.

    Dave Mosher

    April 26, 2011 at 11:34 am

We welcome comments. Please read our comments policy at http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/the-retraction-watch-faq/ and leave your comment below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35,845 other followers

%d bloggers like this: